Lennon v. L. A. W. Acceptance Corp. of R.I.
| Court | Rhode Island Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | STEARNS, J. |
| Citation | Lennon v. L. A. W. Acceptance Corp. of R.I., 48 R.I. 363, 138 A. 215 (R.I. 1927) |
| Decision Date | 05 July 1927 |
| Docket Number | No. 6412.,6412. |
| Parties | LENNON v. L. A. W. ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION OF RHODE ISLAND. |
Certified Question from District Court, Sixth Judicial District.
Action on the case for negligence, brought by James A. Lennon against L. A. W. Acceptance Corporation of Rhode Island. On certified question. Question answered, and papers sent back.
Littlefield, Otis & Knowles and Fred A. Otis, all of Providence, for plaintiff.
Hinckley, Allen, Tillingbast & Phillips, Roger T. Clapp, and Abbott Phillips, all of Providence, for defendant.
Charles P. Sisson, Atty. Gen., and Oscar L. Heltzen, Asst. Atty. Gen., for State Board of Public Roads.
Comstock & Canning, John E. Canning, William A. Graham, Albert A. Baker, and Lee & McCanna, all of Providence, amici curiæ.
This is an action on the case for negligence, which was brought in the Sixth district court and is now in this court on an order of certification by said court. G. L. 1923, c. 348, § 5.
Plaintiff sues to recover for damage to his automobile, caused by the negligent operation of an automobile by one Alfred H. Cann. The automobile, which was driven by Cann, was sold to him by an automobile sales company under a written agreement in the usual form of the so-called "conditional sales contract," whereby title to the automobile is retatned by the seller until full payment is made by the buyer and all other conditions are performed. After the sale on June 22, 1927, the sales company, for value received, indorsed and delivered to defendant the promissory notes of Cann, and assigned to defendant the agreement and all title and interest in the automobile. This action is brought against the defendant as the alleged owner of said automobile, under section 3, chapter 1040, Public Laws 1927:
Defendant demurred to the declaration, and after a hearing the following question has been certified to this court:
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Mason v. Automobile Finance Co.
...Hankins, 1923, 209 Ala. 202, 96 So. 349; Doyon v. Massoline Motor Car Co., 1923, 98 N.J.L. 540, 120 A. 204. 4 Lennon v. L. A. W. Acceptance Corp., 1927, 48 R.I. 363, 138 A. 215; cf. Coonse v. Bechold, 1919, 71 Ind.App. 663, 125 N.E. 5 The authorities relied upon by plaintiff as supporting t......
-
Holmes v. Lilygren Motor Co.
...sales contract comes within that statute, and the conclusion was reached that the buyer is the owner. Lennon v. L. A. W. Acceptance Corporation, 48 R.I. 363, 138 A. 215. So, if in fact the bill of sale and transfer of the registry card was merely intended for additional security and Dandele......
-
W. P. Hamblin, Inc. v. Sprague
...A. 289; Pugh Bros. v. Marano, 44 R. I. 1, 114 A. 133, and the meaning of "owner" in the registration statute, Lennon v. L. A. W. Acceptance Corp. of R. I., 48 R. I. 363, 138 A. 215. In many states these modified conditional sale contracts are subject to statutory regulation. We have no stat......
-
Gasque v. Saidman. Same
...v. Schwartz, D.C.Mun.App., 31 A.2d 857. 5There are cases in other jurisdictions which take the same view. See Lennon v. L. A. W. Acceptance Corporation, 48 R. I. 363, 138 A. 215; Trust Co. of Chicago v. Lewis Auto Sales, 306 Ill.App. 132, 28 N.E.2d 300; Coombes v. Letcher, 104 Mont. 371, 66......