Leod v. Ohio, No. 1117
| Court | United States Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | PER CURIAM |
| Citation | 85 S.Ct. 1556,381 U.S. 356,14 L.Ed.2d 682 |
| Parties | Joseph T. McLEOD v. OHIO. isc |
| Decision Date | 24 May 1965 |
| Docket Number | No. 1117,M |
v.
OHIO.
Supreme Court of the United States
Joseph T. McLeod, pro se.
James V. Barbuto and John D. Smith, for respondent.
On petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Ohio.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Massiah v. United States, 377 U.S. 201, 84 S.Ct. 1199, 12 L.Ed.2d 246.
To continue reading
Request your trial
105 practice notes
-
Davis v. Burke, No. 16728.
...of these confessions was derived from interrogation following indictment. Cf. Massiah v. United States, supra. See also McLeod v. Ohio, 381 U.S. 356, 85 S.Ct. 1556, 14 L.Ed.2d 682 (1965) (per curiam), reversing 1 Ohio St.2d 60, 203 N.E.2d 349 (1964); Beatty v. United States, 389 U.S. 45, 88......
-
State v. Piorkowski, No. 15572
...Sixth Amendment applies." Michigan v. Jackson, 475 U.S. 625, 629-30, 106 S.Ct. 1404, 1407-08, 89 L.Ed.2d 631 (1986). 3 Cf. McLeod v. Ohio, 381 U.S. 356, 85 S.Ct. 1556, 14 L.Ed.2d 682 (1965) (summary reversal of Ohio Supreme Court decision that held that statements of indicted, unrepresented......
-
People v. Charles, Cr. 9657
...U.S. 201, 84 S.Ct. 1199, 12 L.Ed.2d 246, to cases pending on appeal on the date of the Massiah decision. (See, e.g., McLeod v. Ohio (1965) 381 U.S. 356, 85 S.Ct. 1556, 14 L.Ed.2d 682 (per Earlier this year, we reaffirmed the principle implicit in all of these decisions and concluded that co......
-
U.S. v. Mohabir, No. 776
...announced a similar rule, relying on Massiah v. United States, 377 U.S. 201, 84 S.Ct. 1199, 12 L.Ed.2d 246 (1964), and McLeod v. Ohio, 381 U.S. 356, 85 S.Ct. 1556, 14 L.Ed.2d 682 (1965). See United States v. Durham, 475 F.2d 208, 210-11 (7th Cir. 1973); United States ex rel. O'Connor v. New......
Request a trial to view additional results
105 cases
-
Davis v. Burke, No. 16728.
...of these confessions was derived from interrogation following indictment. Cf. Massiah v. United States, supra. See also McLeod v. Ohio, 381 U.S. 356, 85 S.Ct. 1556, 14 L.Ed.2d 682 (1965) (per curiam), reversing 1 Ohio St.2d 60, 203 N.E.2d 349 (1964); Beatty v. United States, 389 U.S. 45, 88......
-
State v. Piorkowski, No. 15572
...Sixth Amendment applies." Michigan v. Jackson, 475 U.S. 625, 629-30, 106 S.Ct. 1404, 1407-08, 89 L.Ed.2d 631 (1986). 3 Cf. McLeod v. Ohio, 381 U.S. 356, 85 S.Ct. 1556, 14 L.Ed.2d 682 (1965) (summary reversal of Ohio Supreme Court decision that held that statements of indicted, unrepresented......
-
People v. Charles, Cr. 9657
...U.S. 201, 84 S.Ct. 1199, 12 L.Ed.2d 246, to cases pending on appeal on the date of the Massiah decision. (See, e.g., McLeod v. Ohio (1965) 381 U.S. 356, 85 S.Ct. 1556, 14 L.Ed.2d 682 (per Earlier this year, we reaffirmed the principle implicit in all of these decisions and concluded that co......
-
U.S. v. Mohabir, No. 776
...announced a similar rule, relying on Massiah v. United States, 377 U.S. 201, 84 S.Ct. 1199, 12 L.Ed.2d 246 (1964), and McLeod v. Ohio, 381 U.S. 356, 85 S.Ct. 1556, 14 L.Ed.2d 682 (1965). See United States v. Durham, 475 F.2d 208, 210-11 (7th Cir. 1973); United States ex rel. O'Connor v. New......
Request a trial to view additional results