Leod v. Ohio, No. 1117

CourtUnited States Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtPER CURIAM
Citation85 S.Ct. 1556,381 U.S. 356,14 L.Ed.2d 682
PartiesJoseph T. McLEOD v. OHIO. isc
Decision Date24 May 1965
Docket NumberNo. 1117,M

381 U.S. 356
85 S.Ct. 1556
14 L.Ed.2d 682
Joseph T. McLEOD

v.

OHIO.

No. 1117, Misc.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 24, 1965
Rehearing Denied Oct. 11, 1965.
See 86 S.Ct. 15.

Joseph T. McLeod, pro se.

James V. Barbuto and John D. Smith, for respondent.

On petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Ohio.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Massiah v. United States, 377 U.S. 201, 84 S.Ct. 1199, 12 L.Ed.2d 246.

To continue reading

Request your trial
105 practice notes
  • Davis v. Burke, No. 16728.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (7th Circuit)
    • April 2, 1969
    ...of these confessions was derived from interrogation following indictment. Cf. Massiah v. United States, supra. See also McLeod v. Ohio, 381 U.S. 356, 85 S.Ct. 1556, 14 L.Ed.2d 682 (1965) (per curiam), reversing 1 Ohio St.2d 60, 203 N.E.2d 349 (1964); Beatty v. United States, 389 U.S. 45, 88......
  • State v. Piorkowski, No. 15572
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Connecticut
    • September 2, 1997
    ...Sixth Amendment applies." Michigan v. Jackson, 475 U.S. 625, 629-30, 106 S.Ct. 1404, 1407-08, 89 L.Ed.2d 631 (1986). 3 Cf. McLeod v. Ohio, 381 U.S. 356, 85 S.Ct. 1556, 14 L.Ed.2d 682 (1965) (summary reversal of Ohio Supreme Court decision that held that statements of indicted, unrepresented......
  • People v. Charles, Cr. 9657
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (California)
    • April 4, 1967
    ...U.S. 201, 84 S.Ct. 1199, 12 L.Ed.2d 246, to cases pending on appeal on the date of the Massiah decision. (See, e.g., McLeod v. Ohio (1965) 381 U.S. 356, 85 S.Ct. 1556, 14 L.Ed.2d 682 (per Earlier this year, we reaffirmed the principle implicit in all of these decisions and concluded that co......
  • U.S. v. Mohabir, No. 776
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
    • June 23, 1980
    ...announced a similar rule, relying on Massiah v. United States, 377 U.S. 201, 84 S.Ct. 1199, 12 L.Ed.2d 246 (1964), and McLeod v. Ohio, 381 U.S. 356, 85 S.Ct. 1556, 14 L.Ed.2d 682 (1965). See United States v. Durham, 475 F.2d 208, 210-11 (7th Cir. 1973); United States ex rel. O'Connor v. New......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
105 cases
  • Davis v. Burke, No. 16728.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (7th Circuit)
    • April 2, 1969
    ...of these confessions was derived from interrogation following indictment. Cf. Massiah v. United States, supra. See also McLeod v. Ohio, 381 U.S. 356, 85 S.Ct. 1556, 14 L.Ed.2d 682 (1965) (per curiam), reversing 1 Ohio St.2d 60, 203 N.E.2d 349 (1964); Beatty v. United States, 389 U.S. 45, 88......
  • State v. Piorkowski, No. 15572
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Connecticut
    • September 2, 1997
    ...Sixth Amendment applies." Michigan v. Jackson, 475 U.S. 625, 629-30, 106 S.Ct. 1404, 1407-08, 89 L.Ed.2d 631 (1986). 3 Cf. McLeod v. Ohio, 381 U.S. 356, 85 S.Ct. 1556, 14 L.Ed.2d 682 (1965) (summary reversal of Ohio Supreme Court decision that held that statements of indicted, unrepresented......
  • People v. Charles, Cr. 9657
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (California)
    • April 4, 1967
    ...U.S. 201, 84 S.Ct. 1199, 12 L.Ed.2d 246, to cases pending on appeal on the date of the Massiah decision. (See, e.g., McLeod v. Ohio (1965) 381 U.S. 356, 85 S.Ct. 1556, 14 L.Ed.2d 682 (per Earlier this year, we reaffirmed the principle implicit in all of these decisions and concluded that co......
  • U.S. v. Mohabir, No. 776
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
    • June 23, 1980
    ...announced a similar rule, relying on Massiah v. United States, 377 U.S. 201, 84 S.Ct. 1199, 12 L.Ed.2d 246 (1964), and McLeod v. Ohio, 381 U.S. 356, 85 S.Ct. 1556, 14 L.Ed.2d 682 (1965). See United States v. Durham, 475 F.2d 208, 210-11 (7th Cir. 1973); United States ex rel. O'Connor v. New......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT