Leonard v. Field
Decision Date | 28 May 1934 |
Docket Number | No. 7285.,7285. |
Citation | 71 F.2d 483 |
Parties | LEONARD v. FIELD. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Douglas T. Ballinger, of Seattle, Wash., for appellant.
Raymond G. Wright and Gail M. Williams, both of Seattle, Wash., for appellee.
Before WILBUR, SAWTELLE, and GARRECHT, Circuit Judges.
This is an appeal from an order of the District Court made and entered September 12, 1933, affirming an order of the referee in bankruptcy made on May 10, 1932, disallowing a petition for reclamation filed by A. W. Leonard. According to the allegations of the various claims and petitions for reclamation filed by the petitioner he intrusted certain stocks of the aggregate value of $28,464.50 to the bankrupt as security for margins upon stock to be purchased by the bankrupt for and on behalf of the appellant.
On June 22, 1931, appellant filed claim for $31,500 for the conversion of the securities deposited by him as collateral which it was alleged were sold without authority. The next day the claim was withdrawn, claimant averring "that since said claim was turned over to be filed claimant has learned additional facts which make it unwise for him to prove his claim as a general creditor." On October 27, 1931 a claim was filed for $28,464.50, together with interest from June 25, 1930, at 6 per cent. per annum for the conversion of the aforementioned stock including 20 shares of the Pacific National Bank of Seattle, valued at $5,400, and 200 shares of Stone and Webster stock valued at $11,512.50. This claim was filed by James Crehan of Seattle, assignee petitioner. In the meantime, on March 10, 1932, the referee in bankruptcy made an order that all claims "to any of the stocks, bonds, securities, cash or assets of any kind or the proceeds thereof now in the possession of the trustee in bankruptcy be filed on or before April 15, 1932, or be forever barred." Personal notice thereof was to be given to all known claimants and also published for two weeks in the Daily Journal of Commerce. Thereafter, on April 14, 1932, petitioner filed a claim for the proceeds of the sale of 20 shares of stock of the Pacific National Bank of Seattle, being the 20 shares of Pacific National Bank stock mentioned in the claim theretofore filed for $28,464.50. This petition was granted in part for the sum of $2,842.65 on May 17, 1932. On April 30th, after the date fixed for filing claims in reclamation, petitioner filed a petition for reclamation for the proceeds of the sale of 100 shares of Stone and Webster common stock. Flora Muffley joined in this petition making a similar claim for the proceeds of 50 shares of the Puget Sound Power & Light Company stock. It was alleged in this claim by the claimants that these shares of stock were given to the bankrupt as collateral security for the purchase of stocks listed on the New York Exchange, but as a matter of fact no such stocks were purchased and that the stocks pledged by the claimants were hypothecated by him without right or authority for a loan of $8,500, that the pledge holder had sold the property for $12,048.68, and that the balance of $3,645 had been paid to the trustee in bankruptcy as a part of the fund turned over by the equity receiver for the bankrupt who had been appointed in an equitable action before bankruptcy. In this joint claim there was no segregation of the amount claimed by the two claimants. Supplementary to this claim a verified petition for a hearing was filed on May 10, 1932. This petition alleged the making of the claim of October 27, 1931, for $28,464.50, and alleged:
To continue reading
Request your trial- Estes Express Lines v. United States
-
Crittenden v. Lines
...3 Collier, Bankruptcy § 57.34. 3 Dickey v. Todd, 116 F.2d 979 (5th Cir. 1941); In re Noble, 21 F.Supp. 840 (D. N.Y.1937); Leonard v. Field, 71 F.2d 483 (9th Cir. 1934). 4 Kimberly Corporation v. Hartley Pen Company, 237 F.2d 294 (9th Cir. 1956); Boris v. Hamilton Manufacturing Company, 253 ......
-
Beck v. Federal Land Bank of Houston
...proof in certiorari that there was no evidence before the trial court); Spruill v. Crawford, 64 App.D.C. 118, 75 F.2d 522; Leonard v. Field, 9 Cir., 71 F.2d 483, 487; Federal Surety Co. v. Bentley & Sons Co., 6 Cir., 51 F.2d 24, 26, 78 A.L.R. 1041. On the record now before us, as against ap......