Leonard v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., JOHNS-MANVILLE

Citation294 S.E.2d 371,306 N.C. 558
Decision Date25 August 1982
Docket NumberJOHNS-MANVILLE
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of North Carolina
PartiesMarie LEONARD, Administratrix of the Estate of Samuel L. Leonard, Deceased v.SALES CORPORATION, et al.

Haywood, Denny & Miller, Durham, for plaintiffs.

Crossley & Johnson, Wilmington, for defendant.

Plaintiff's petition for discretionary review, N.C.App., 291 S.E.2d 828, under G.S. § 7A-31 denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Stetser v. TAP PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • July 6, 2004
    ... ... was based upon an alleged illegal marketing and sales scheme for Lupron® by defendants TAP, Abbott and Takeda ... American Motors Corp., 326 N.C. 723, 392 S.E.2d 735 (1990) ). "If the ... ...
  • Goldston v. American Motors Corp.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • June 13, 1990
    ...the apparent disharmony with the decision in Leonard v. Johns-Manville Corp., 57 N.C.App. 553, 291 S.E.2d 828, cert. denied, 306 N.C. 558, 294 S.E.2d 371 (1982). There the Court of Appeals denied the appeal on the basis that the trial court's interlocutory order denying a motion for admissi......
  • Dance v. Manning
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • October 19, 2010
    ...Sales Corp., 57 N.C.App. 553, 555, 291 S.E.2d 828, 829 (citations and quotation marks omitted), disc. review denied, 306 N.C. 558, 294 S.E.2d 371 (1982). Plaintiff argues that in Goldston v. American Motors Corp., the Supreme Court held that the plaintiff's interlocutory appeal should be co......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT