Leonard v. Spencer
| Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
| Writing for the Court | EARL |
| Citation | Leonard v. Spencer , 108 N.Y. 338, 15 N.E. 397 (N.Y. 1888) |
| Decision Date | 10 February 1888 |
| Parties | LEONARD v. SPENCER et al. |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from general term, supreme court, Second department.
The action was brought to abate a mill-pond, on the ground that it was a nuisance, and injurious to the public health. An appeal was taken by the defendants, James E. Spencer and others, from a judgment rendered by the supreme court at general term, in the Second district, reversing the judgment of the special term, and directing an absolute judgment for the plaintiff.
Martin J. Keogh, for appellants.
W. H. Robertson, for respondent.
Besides denying the allegations contained in the complaint, the answer of the defendants sets up but two defenses, one of which is that the mill-pond ‘has existed in the place where it now is for more than one hundred years, and during all the time of its said existence the plaintiff or his grantors have, with the exception of about a year or two last past, assented to and acquiesced in the maintenance of the said pond and the dam by which it was caused;’ and the other is that The trial judge found all the material facts alleged in the complaint as to the nuisance maintained by the defendants, and its effects, to be true. As to the acquiesence of the plaintiff, he found substantially as follows: That the pond is an ancient pond, and existed in substantially the same condition as it now is at the time when, and for a great many years before, the plaintiff became the owner of his dwelling-house, with notice of the rights and easements of the defendants and their grantors in, to, and over the pond, and the lands covered thereby; that in the year 1877, and several years after the plaintiff had owned and resided in his dwelling-house, the defendants James E. Spencer and John S. Spencer, being owners of the lands conveyed to them as alleged in their answer, built thereon, with the knowledge and acquiesence of the plaintiff, and without objection on his part, a large factory for the manufacture of optical instruments, which was operated and worked by the water drawn from the pond as a reservoir, under the terms and conditions of the covenants set out in the answer; that thereafter the factory was burned down, and another large factory, for the same purpose, and operated in the same way, was built by the defendants, at great expense, and with the full knowledge and acquiesence of the plaintiff, and without objection or complaint on his part; that the defendant the Spencer Optical Manufacturing...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Smith v. City of Sedalia
... ... 387; Lead Co. v. White, 106 Mo.App. 222; ... Scheurich v. Light Co., 109 Mo.App. 406; Muellor ... v. Fruen, 36 Minn. 273; Leonard v. Spencer, 108 ... N.Y. 338; Tiedeman on Real Property, sec. 653. (9) The ... pendency of the former action for damages for a different ... ...
-
Benz v. City of St. Paul
... ... Oleson, 125 Ill. 365; Perry v ... Hardy (N.H.) 51 A. 6449, Robbins Hardy (N.H.) 51 A. 644; ... Robbins v. Moore, 129 Ill. 30; Leonard v ... Spencer, 108 N.Y. 338; Story, Eq. Jur. §§ 619, ... 1544; Schraeder Mining & Mnfg. Co. v. Packer, 129 ... U.S. 688; Bigelow, Est. (4th ... ...
-
United States v. Luce
... ... on his part as to render it fraudulent or inequitable that he ... should seek its suppression. In Leonard v. Spencer, ... 108 N.Y. 338, 346, 15 N.E. 397, the court through Earl, J., ... 'There ... was no such acquiescence, within the meaning ... ...
-
Parker v. American Woolen Co.
...not lost his rights by laches was fully justified. Morse v. Hill, 136 Mass. 60, 66; Nudd v. Powers, 136 Mass. 273, 277; Leonard v. Spencer, 108 N.Y. 338, 15 N.E. 397; Tazewell v. Saunders, 13 Grat. (Va.) 354; Bussche v. Alt, 8 Ch. D. 286. Accordingly we are of opinion that the plaintiff's e......