Lepofsky v. City of Lincoln Park

Decision Date19 March 1968
Docket NumberDocket No. 2872,No. 1,1
Citation9 Mich.App. 501,157 N.W.2d 463
PartiesFred LEPOFSKY and Bessie Lepofsky, d/b/a Liberty Auto Wrecking, and Theodore Lepofsky and Sidney Lepofsky, Plaintiffs-Appellees, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF LINCOLN PARK, a municipal corporation; Ronald R. Stempien, Mayor; John A. Aloisi, George A. Barber, Robert A. DeMars, Max F. Schiebold, Robert L. Tripp, Russell W. White, Councilmen; and Carl Walkmaster, Chief of Police of the City of Lincoln Park, Defendants-Appellants
CourtCourt of Appeal of Michigan — District of US

Robert E. Butcher, Lincoln Park, for appellants.

Edward Grebs, Detroit, for appellees.

Before FITZGERALD, P.J., and LEVIN and T. G. KAVANAGH, JJ.

T. G. KAVANAGH, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the Wayne county circuit court granting a writ of mandamus to compel the defendant city to issue a license to the plaintiffs to conduct an auto parts business.

Plaintiffs Fred and Bessie Lepofsky, d/b/a Liberty Auto Wrecking, have been licensed to operate a used auto parts business in Lincoln Park for more than 30 years. Plaintiffs Theodore and Sidney Lepofsky, according to defendants, have never had a license. All licenses under the city ordinance are issued annually and expire on each June 30. In May, 1966 an application for a used auto parts license for the year beginning July 1, 1966 was filed in the name of Liberty Auto Wrecking, and it sought a license for 2 separate premises--1007 and 1059 Fort street. In the original complaint filed on June 29, 1966, only Fred and Bessie Lepofsky were named as plaintiffs. They alleged that the city had not yet passed upon the license application and asked the court to issue a writ of mandamus compelling the city to issue the license. Defendants filed an answer wherein they admitted that final action had not been taken on the application, but they stated that the application was considered by the mayor and city council on June 27 and that the hearing thereon was adjourned until July 5 for the claimed reason that the premises violated the city fire code because certain combustibles were being stored there. Defendants further asserted that on August 1 the city council denied the application for a license for 1007 Fort street for the following reasons:

'(a) The fence surrounding the premises does not comply with the requirements of the licensing ordinance and constitutes a public and private nuisance;

'(b) The applicants for license are...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • People v. Keys
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • March 19, 1968
  • Lepofsky v. City of Lincoln Park
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • July 23, 1973
    ...answer and without a hearing on the issues framed by the amended pleadings, we reversed on appeal and remanded. Lepofsky v. Lincoln Park, 9 Mich.App. 501, 157 N.W.2d 463 (1968). The case having been remanded, plaintiffs Fred, Bessie, Theodore and Sidney Lepofsky, doing business as Liberty A......
  • Burger King Corp. v. City of Detroit
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • May 11, 1971
    ...this appeal ensues. The lower court erred in granting relief to plaintiff solely on the pleadings before it. Lepofsky v. City of Lincoln Park (1968), 9 Mich.App. 501, 157 N.W.2d 463. In a mandamus action, the burden is on the plaintiff to present proof that the defendant has a clear, legal ......
  • Rupert, In re, Docket No. 145148
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • June 6, 1994
    ...stating as follows: The lower court erred in granting relief to plaintiff solely on the pleadings before it. Lepofsky v City of Lincoln Park [9 Mich.App. 501, 157 N.W.2d 463 (1968) ]. In a mandamus action, the burden is on the plaintiff to present proof that the defendant has a clear, legal......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT