Levene v. State
Decision Date | 09 May 1935 |
Docket Number | 1 Div. 156 |
Citation | 26 Ala.App. 428,161 So. 268 |
Court | Alabama Court of Appeals |
Parties | LEVENE v. STATE. |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Mobile County; J. Blocker Thornton Judge.
Dominick Levene was convicted of assault and battery, and he appeals.
Affirmed.
George A. Sossaman, of Mobile, for appellant.
A.A Carmichael, Atty. Gen., for the State.
The indictment in this case charged this appellant with the offense of assault and battery upon Oliver H., alias Tex Harbin. He was tried thereon and convicted; the jury assessing a fine against him of $200. From the judgment of conviction, this appeal was taken.
The several exceptions reserved to the court's rulings upon the admission of evidence cannot avail the appellant, as the evidence in question related to facts incident to the res gestae, and was therefore admissible. Res gestae is a matter incident to the main fact and explanatory of it, including acts and words which are so closely connected therewith as to constitute a part of the transaction, without knowledge of which the main fact might not be properly understood; they are instinctive words and acts of the participants immediately prior to the main fact and leading up to and explanatory thereof. The testimony objected to in this case but allowed by the court, was of this character; hence, under the rule announced, was admissible.
Appellant complains in brief that the punishment in this case was excessive, also that the verdict rendered was a "quotient verdict," therefore void. These matters could be presented only upon a motion for a new trial, and this was undertaken in this case in the court below, but the motion for a new trial is not presented in a manner which authorizes this court to review the ruling of the trial judge on the motion, as it does not appear that an exception was reserved to the court's ruling in this connection. This is essential to a review. Section 6088, Code 1923. See, also, Shepard's Alabama Citations, Nov. 1934, Sup. p. 249, for numerous cases cited.
In seeking a review by the appellate courts upon the ruling of the lower court overruling a motion for a new trial, the statute does not require that the motion and judgment thereon shall be set out in the bill of exceptions, but under the statute (Code 1923, § 6088) it is mandatory that the bill of exceptions must contain a sufficient recital to show the making of such motion, the ruling...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Burlison v. State
...part of the res gestae of the offense with which the defendant is charged. Parsons v. State, 251 Ala. 467, 38 So.2d 209; Levene v. State, 26 Ala.App. 428, 161 So. 268. Because Laird's truck, the subject of this prosecution, had no broken windows, there is no immediately apparent connection ......
-
Claridy v. State, 5 Div. 140
...In the case at bar the State and the appellant have cited some of the leading cases on this subject. In the case of Levene v. State, 26 Ala.App. 428, 161 So. 268, cited by both, the matter is defined as 'Res gestae is a matter incident to the main fact and explanatory of it, including acts ......
-
Blair v. State
... ... conviction from which this appeal was taken ... The ... motion for a new trial is not presented for our consideration ... as it nowhere appears in the bill of exceptions that an ... exception to the court's ruling thereon was reserved ... This is necessary. Levene v. State, 26 Ala.App. 428, ... 161 So. 268. In that case the court said: "In seeking a ... review by the appellate courts upon the ruling of the lower ... court overruling a motion for a new trial, the statute does ... [187 So. 647] ... not require that the motion and judgment thereon shall ... ...
-
Evans v. State, 8 Div. 405.
... ... a sufficient recital to show ... [22 So.2d 98.] ... making of motion for new trial, the ruling thereon and an ... exception thereto; otherwise alleged error in overruling such ... motion will not be noticed. Wilson v. State, 25 ... Ala.App. 298 [145 So. 591]; Levene v. State, 26 ... Ala.App. 428 [161 So. 268].' ... The ... writer is clearly of the opinion that the conviction of the ... defendant, under the undisputed testimony in this case, is of ... very doubtful propriety, and while this court can go no ... further, the writer is also of the ... ...