Leverette v. Ainsworth

Decision Date26 November 1945
Docket Number35967.
Citation199 Miss. 652,23 So.2d 798
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
PartiesLEVERETTE v. AINSWORTH.

S. C. Mims and Cowles Horton, both of Grenada, for appellant.

Roberson & Luckett, of Clarksdale, for appellee.

GRIFFITH, Justice.

Immediately prior to the transaction here directly involved, F. M Leverette had been having some difficulties which had incited him to shift his bank accounts, and which culminated in his making a deposit on December 11, 1943, in the Grenada Trust & Banking Company of $5,100 to the credit of his mother the appellant here. The deposit slip which evidenced this deposit showed that the deposit was to the credit of Mrs Annie C. Leverette, but it bore the notation on its face made by the cashier at the direction of the depositor as follows 'This A/C subject to check by F. M. Leverette at any time,' and the signature card, contemporaneously taken to cover the account, carried the statement: 'Authorized signatures, F. M. Leverette, subject to check by F. M. Leverette at any time.'

F. M. Leverette died on April 4, 1944, and appellee was duly appointed administratrix of his estate. On May 10, 1944, she filed her bill as administratrix to have the deposit declared the property of the estate. Upon final hearing a decree was entered in accordance with the prayer of the bill, and we think the court was correct.

It is well settled that a person may make a gift in severalty to another by making a deposit of the subject of the gift in a bank to the credit of the donee provided the donor in so doing retains no such control over the deposit as will enable him to withdraw it for his own personal uses or purposes. If he retains a control such as mentioned, and as was retained in the present case, the transaction will be ineffective as a gift in severalty and the deposit will remain the property of the depositor. Meyer v. Meyer, 106 Miss. 638, 64 So. 420; Yates' Estate v. Alabama-Mississippi Conference Ass'n, 179 Miss. 642, 176 So. 534; Smith v. Taylor, 183 Miss. 542, 184 So. 423; 32 Am.Jur. Gifts, Sec. 101; 38 C.J.S., Gifts, § 49.

It in equally well settled that a person may make a gift in joint tenure by making a deposit of the subject of the gift in a bank in such a manner that it shall stand to the credit, as joint owners, of the donor and the donee, as where, for illustration, John Doe makes a deposit to the credit of 'John Doe or Richard Roe,' which under the statute Section 5205, Code 1942, Section 3809, Code 1930, would raise the presumption that the deposit was intended to be in joint ownership, and by the further force of the statute, subject to withdrawal by either of the joint owners. ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Cooper v. Crabb
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • September 11, 1991
    ...herself and Cooper, as their interests may appear. Today's instruments evidence "a gift in joint tenure," Leverette v. Ainsworth, 199 Miss. 652, 657, 23 So.2d 798, 799 (1945), and are enforceable as such. Estate of Strange, 548 So.2d at 1328; cf. Miss.Code Ann. Sec. 89-1-7 (1972). They "may......
  • Estate of Stamper
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • August 19, 1992
    ...Myers v. Laird, 230 Miss. 675, 93 So.2d 828 (1957); Shearin v. Coleman, 201 Miss. 193, 28 So.2d 841 (1947); Leverette v. Ainsworth, 199 Miss. 652, 23 So.2d 798 (1946); In re Estate of Lewis, supra; and Stephens v. Stephens, 193 Miss. 98, 8 So.2d 462 (1942). Within that vacillation, however,......
  • Will and Estate of Strange, In re, 07-58715
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • September 13, 1989
    ...as the law. Simply, it cannot be the law in this case or similar cases involving the same or like issues. In Leverette v. Ainsworth, 199 Miss. 652, 23 So.2d 798 (1945), the Court, speaking through Justice Virgil Griffith, It is equally well settled that a person may make a gift in joint ten......
  • In re Estate of Baker, No. 1998-CA-01164-SCT.
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • June 1, 2000
    ...survivorship when formal deficiencies are balanced by definite proof of intention to create such an account. Leverette v. Ainsworth, 199 Miss. 652, 657, 23 So.2d 798, 799 (1945). "[W]hen there is a clear intention to create a right which embraces the essential elements of joint ownership an......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT