Levi v. State
| Decision Date | 03 July 1914 |
| Docket Number | No. 22444.,22444. |
| Citation | 105 N.E. 898,182 Ind. 188 |
| Parties | LEVI v. STATE. |
| Court | Indiana Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
On motion for rehearing. Motion denied. For former opinion, see 104 N. E. 765.
Petition for rehearing overruled.
The petition for rehearing is correctly overruled, because of the misconduct of counsel for the state, but, in my opinion, the evidence of witnesses for appellee, given on a former hearing, was correctly admitted on the showing that at the time of the second trial they resided outside of Indiana. Reichers v. Dammeier, 45 Ind. App. 208, 90 N. E. 644; 5 Encyc. Ev. 904; Robertson v. State (1911) 63 Tex. Cr. R. 216, 142 S. W. 533, and monographic note, same case, Ann. Cas. 1913C, 465; McGovern v. Smith, 75 Vt. 104, 53 Atl. 326, and cases cited; Atkinson, T. & S. F. R. Co. v. Baker, 37 Okl. 48, 130 Pac. 577;Emerson v. Burnett, 11 Colo. App. 86, 52 Pac. 752; Wigmore on Ev. §§ 1401, 1402, 1404; Edwards v. State (Okl. Cr. App.) 131 Pac. 956, 44 L. R. A. (N. S.) 707; monographic note to Atchinson, etc., R. Co., v. Osborn, 91 Am. St. Rep. 193 (195); monographic note to Spencer v. State, 13 Ann. Cas. 973; note to State v. Nelson, 1 Ann. Cas. 471.
COX, C. J., concurs in this conclusion.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Budge
...v. Bruno, 220 N. T. 702, 115 N. E. 1004; State v. Emory, 116 Kan. 381, 386, 220 P. 754; Levi v. State, 182 Ind. 188, 192, 104 N. E. 765, 105 N. E. 898, Ann. Cas. 1917A, 654; State v. Nelson, 68 Kan. 566, 75 P. 505, 1 Ann. Cas. 468; People v. Lewandowski, 143 Cal. 574, 77 P. 467; Huff v. Cur......
-
New York Cent. R. Co. v. Pinnell, 16682.
...46 Ind.App. 467, 480, 87 N.E. 702;Rooker v. Parsley, 1880, 72 Ind. 497;Schearer v. Harber, 1871, 36 Ind. 536, 541;Levi v. State, 1914, 182 Ind. 188, 191, 104 N.E. 765, 105 N.E. 898, Ann.Cas.1917A, 654;Zimmerman v. State, 1921, 190 Ind. 537, 130 N.E. 235;Hamilton v. State, 1934, 207 Ind. 97,......
-
See Ben Realty Co. v. Gothberg, 2168
...court, an effort should be made to induce them to come within such jurisdiction voluntarily. Levi v. State, 182 Ind. 188, 104 N.E. 765, 105 N.E. 898; Slusser Taylor & Co. Burlington, 47 Iowa 300. The rule in Massachusetts is that such former testimony will not be received unless the witness......
-
New York Cent. R. Co. v. Pinnell
... ... exercise of due diligence his deposition could not have been ... taken, or that the witness is a nonresident of the state, or ... that he is absent from his residence, and his whereabouts ... cannot, by due diligence, be ascertained, or that he has ... absented ... 467, 480, 87 N.E. 702; ... Rooker v. Parsley, 1880, 72 Ind. 497; Schearer ... v. Harber, 1871, 36 Ind. 536, 541; Levi v ... State, 1914, 182 Ind. 188, 191, 104 N.E. 765, 105 N.E ... 898, Ann.Cas.1917A, 654; Zimmerman v. State, 1921, ... 190 Ind. 537, 130 N.E ... ...