Levine v. City of New York, 1462.
| Court | New York Supreme Court Appellate Division |
| Citation | 2009 NY Slip Op 08163,67 A.D.3d 510,888 N.Y.S.2d 55 |
| Docket Number | 1462. |
| Parties | JERRY LEVINE et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent. |
| Decision Date | 12 November 2009 |
v.
CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Shulman, J.), entered May 27, 2008, which, in an action for personal injuries allegedly caused by malfunctioning elevator doors that closed too quickly as plaintiff was exiting the elevator, granted defendant premises owner's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs. [See 2008 NY Slip Op 31445(U).]
Assuming defendant, the City of New York, had a nondelegable duty to maintain the elevators in this building, a courthouse, in a reasonably safe condition, even though it had ceded all responsibility for maintenance and repair of the elevators to an independent contractor, a showing that defendant had notice of the alleged malfunction would still be necessary (see Camaj v East 52nd Partners, 215 AD2d 150, 151 [1995]). No such showing was made by plaintiff in response to defendant's evidence that prior to the accident there had been no complaints that the subject elevator's doors were closing too quickly, and it does not avail plaintiff that defendant did have notice that the elevator's
doors were not opening and closing—a different mechanical problem (see Gjonaj v Otis El. Co., 38 AD3d 384 [2007]; Lapin v Atlantic Realty Apts. Co., LLC, 48 AD3d 337, 338 [2008]; Narvaez v New York City Hous. Auth., 62 AD3d 419 [2009]). Nor does the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur avail plaintiff where defendant had ceded all maintenance and repair responsibility to an independent contractor (see Hodges v Royal Realty Corp., 42 AD3d 350, 351-352 [2007]).
Concur—MAZZARELLI, J.P., SWEENY, CATTERSON, ACOSTA and ABDUS-SALAAM, JJ.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Lloyds London v. Evanston, Index No. 151786/2012
...of exclusive control necessary for any inference of defendant's liability for the harm the unit caused. Levine v. City of New York, 67 A.D.3d 510., 511 (1st Dep't 2009); Hodges v. Royal Realty Corp., 42 A.D.3d 350, 352 (1st Dep't 2007). Even if water ieaking from the HVAC unit were a condit......
-
Forde v. Trust
...A.D.3d 491, 495, 922 N.Y.S.2d 375; Cilinger v. Arditi Realty Corp., 77 A.D.3d 880, 882–883, 911 N.Y.S.2d 75; Levine v. City of New York, 67 A.D.3d 510, 888 N.Y.S.2d 55; Talapin v. One Madison Ave. Condominium, 63 A.D.3d 909, 910–911, 882 N.Y.S.2d 161; Fyall v. Centennial El. Indus., Inc., 4......
-
Singh v. United Cerebral Palsy of N.Y. City Inc.
...who, according to plaintiff, “got stuck” between the doors, made any complaints about those incidents ( see Levine v. City of New York, 67 A.D.3d 510, 888 N.Y.S.2d 55 [2009] ). Plaintiff's claim that UCP was negligent in failing to conduct regular inspections of the motion sensor is unavail......
-
Isaac v. 1515 Macombs Llc
...malfunctions or defects causing injury to a plaintiff about which it has constructive or actual notice ( see Levine v. City of New York, 67 A.D.3d 510, 888 N.Y.S.2d 55 [2009] ), or where, despite having an exclusive maintenance and repair contract with an elevator company, it fails to notif......