Lew Hammer, Inc. v. Dash, Inc.

Decision Date03 May 1979
Docket NumberT-R,No. 78-234,78-234
Citation599 P.2d 948,42 Colo.App. 414
PartiesLEW HAMMER, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DASH, INC. and Beneficial Standard Mortgage Investors, Defendants-Appellees, v.DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, the Hollydot Park Company, Harley G. Renzelman, d/b/a Renzelman Painting Contractor, Dick Van Riper, John Ayler, d/b/a John Ayler Plastering Contractor, Hollydot Park Water and Sanitation Company, Ladd Lumber & Mercantile Co., Richard Hazelton, Marge Hazelton, Howard K. Taton, Ollie Mae Taton, P. E. Goodwin, Dr. Kenneth Q. Pershall, Dr. Chris J. Boehm, the Rye Telephone Company, Inc., McIntire and Quiros of Colorado, Inc., Ray Askew d/b/a Ray Askew Plumbing& Heating, Gene Royce d/b/a Gene Royce Electric, Athey Beaman Roofing Co., Inc., Sam P. Geanetta, d/b/a Geanetta Plumbing & Heating, Pueblo, Juanita Reutter, d/b/a Reutter Construction Company, Keith Swerdfeger, d/b/a K. R. Swerdfeger Construction, Glenn L. Weidner, d/b/a Rocky Mountain Heating & Cooling, and George M. Bollinger, as Public Trustee of the County of Pueblo, State of Colorado, Defendants. . III
CourtColorado Court of Appeals
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 cases
  • Ferguson Enters., Inc. v. Keybuild Solutions, Inc.
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • December 22, 2011
    ...any prior lien or encumbrance, or mortgage upon the land upon which the same is erected or put.... In Lew Hammer, Inc. v. Dash, Inc., 42 Colo.App. 414, 416–17, 599 P.2d 948, 949–50 (1979), a division of this court addressed this statutory provision, and held that it applies to the construct......
  • Western Nat. Bank of Casper v. ABC Drilling Co., Inc.
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • May 3, 1979
  • Powder Mountain Painting v. Peregrine Joint Venture
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • December 15, 1994
    ...of new improvements as distinguished from expansion, repair, and remodeling of existing improvements. Lew Hammer, Inc. v. Dash, Inc., 42 Colo.App. 414, 599 P.2d 948 (1979). The phrase "for any entire structure" does not refer to the completion of a building, erection, or improvement existen......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT