Lewis v. Ames
| Docket Number | 17-1045 |
| Decision Date | 21 November 2019 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
4 cases
-
Frank A. v. Ames
...any grounds not raised in a petition for writ of habeas corpus – or here, an amended petition – are waived. See Lewis v. Ames , 242 W. Va. 405, 410, 836 S.E.2d 56, 61 (2019) ("our law clearly supports the proposition that any grounds not raised in the petition for habeas corpus are deemed w......
-
State v. Kennedy
...any lesser-included offense." State v. Corra , 223 W. Va. 573, 583, 678 S.E.2d 306, 316 (2009), holding modified by Lewis v. Ames , 242 W. Va. 405, 836 S.E.2d 56 (2019). When we review a circuit court's decision to instruct a jury on a lesser included offense, we typically focus on two thin......
-
State v. Malcomb
...(2015). This waiver was the direct result of the jury instruction at issue being offered by [p]etitioner . . . .Lewis v. Ames, 242 W. Va. 405, 410, 836 S.E.2d 56, 61 (2019). In addition, petitioner's complaint relates not to an element of the crime charged but an element of a defense assert......
-
State v. Lewis
...any unraised issues were waived. Once again, petitioner appealed to this Court. In a signed opinion from this Court, Lewis v. Ames, ___ W. Va. ___, 836 S.E.2d 56 (2019), we found "that the errors raised in this appeal were either not raised below and therefore waived, or were previously and......
