Lewis v. Blackburn
| Decision Date | 24 April 1985 |
| Docket Number | Nos. 83-1040,s. 83-1040 |
| Citation | 759 F.2d 1171 |
| Parties | Georgia J. LEWIS, Appellee, v. R. Max BLACKBURN, Appellant, and Frank W. Snepp, Defendant. North Carolina Civil Liberties Union, Amicus Curiae. Georgia J. LEWIS, Appellee, v. R. Max BLACKBURN, Defendant, and Frank W. Snepp, Appellant. North Carolina Civil Liberties Union, Amicus Curiae. (L), 83-1041. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit |
Harry H. Harkins, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Raleigh, N.C. (Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen., Millard R. Rich, Jr., Deputy Atty. Gen., Raleigh, N.C., Jane S. Barkley, Charlotte, N.C., on brief), for appellants.
George Daly, Charlotte, N.C., for appellee.
(Daniel H. Pollitt, Norman B. Smith, Greensboro, N.C., Dean Shangler, Law Student, University of North Carolina, Jay Trehy, Law Student, University of North Carolina on brief), for amicus curiae.
Before WINTER, Chief Judge, and RUSSELL, WIDENER, HALL, PHILLIPS, MURNAGHAN, SPROUSE, ERVIN, CHAPMAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
For the reasons adequately set forth in Judge Ervin's dissent to the original panel opinion, Lewis v. Blackburn, 734 F.2d 1000, 1008-1012 (4th Cir.1984), we reverse the decision of the district court. 555 F.Supp. 713. We hold that the district court erred as a matter of law in finding that Georgia Lewis was not reappointed because she protested matters of public concern rather than matters of her immediate self-interest, within the meaning of the Supreme Court's ruling in Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138, 103 S.Ct. 1684, 75 L.Ed.2d 708 (1983). 1 Accordingly, the decision of the district court is reversed and the case is remanded for the entry of judgment in favor of the defendants.
Chief Judge Winter and Judge Wilkinson would affirm the district court's decision. They dissent on the grounds articulated in the original panel's majority opinion. Lewis, 734 F.2d at 1000-08.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
1 The decision in Connick was not handed down until after the district court rendered its decision in this case, but the parties were invited to and did file supplemental briefs in response to that opinion.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Forrester v. White
...555 F.Supp. 713 (W.D.N.C.1983) (decision by state judge not to reappoint magistrate not judicial act), rev'd on other grounds, 759 F.2d 1171 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ---, 106 S.Ct. 228, 88 L.Ed.2d 288 (1985); Marafino v. St. Louis County Circuit Court, 537 F.Supp. 206 (E.D.Mo.1982......
-
Buschi v. Kirven
...v. Florida, 328 U.S. 331, 335, 66 S.Ct. 1029, 1031, 90 L.Ed. 1295 (1946) ). This was declared unequivocally in Lewis v. Blackburn, 759 F.2d 1171 (4th Cir.1985) (en banc), vacating the opinion of the majority in the panel opinion and adopting the dissenting opinion of Judge Ervin, 734 F.2d 1......
-
McWaters v. Rick
...other decisions involving analogous plaintiffs. For example, in Lewis v. Blackburn, 734 F.2d 1000 (4th Cir.1984), reversed 759 F.2d 1171 (4th Cir.1985) (en banc), the Fourth Circuit addressed a First Amendment retaliation claim brought by a former state magistrate judge against the clerk of......
-
Davis v. Tarrant County, Tex.
...F.Supp. 713, 723 (W.D.N.C.1983) (holding that a judge's appointment of magistrates is a ministerial act), rev'd on other grounds, 759 F.2d 1171 (4th Cir.1985); see also Supreme Court of Va. v. Consumers Union of U.S., Inc., 446 U.S. 719, 731, 100 S.Ct. 1967, 64 L.Ed.2d 641 (1980) (holding t......
-
Prisoners' Rights
...against magistrate for their exercise of 1st and 14th Amendment rights to free speech and to redress in federal courts), reh’g granted, 759 F.2d 1171 (4th Cir. 1985). 3226. Only natural persons may qualify for treatment in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. See Rowland v. Cal. Men’s Col......