Lewis v. Georgia
| Docket Number | S12A0400 |
| Decision Date | 25 June 2012 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
22 cases
-
Meders v. Chatman
...have been forever found defaulted. Dkt. No. 49, at 81-82 (citing Williams v. Turpin, 87 F.3d 1204, 1210 (11th Cir. 1996); Lewis v. State, 291 Ga. 273, 282 (2012)). Moreover, Respondent argues that Georgia's requirement of raising IAC as soon as practicable should not bear on whether the sta......
-
Ford Motor Co. v. Conley
...exercise of ordinary diligence, and remained silent, that party will be presumed to have waived the disqualification.”Lewis v. State, 291 Ga. 273, 275, 731 S.E.2d 51 (2012) (citation omitted). See also Citizens & S. Nat. Bank v. Haskins, 254 Ga. 131, 138, 327 S.E.2d 192 (1985) (holding that......
-
Wiggins v. State
...opportunity is a procedural bar to raising the issue at a later time.” (Citation omitted; emphasis in original.) Lewis v. State , 291 Ga. 273, 281, 731 S.E.2d 51 (2012).14 On appeal, Wiggins asserts that even if the evidence shows that she was aware that she could get a life sentence, she w......
-
Deleon-Alvarez v. Palacios-Baras
...S.E.2d 391 (2012) (“The failure to pursue a futile motion does not constitute ineffective assistance.”); see also Lewis v. State, 291 Ga. 273, 282(7), 731 S.E.2d 51 (2012) (reiterating that a remand to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing on an ineffectiveness claim is not necessary w......
Get Started for Free