Lewis v. Kaplan
Citation | 5 S.W.2d 699 |
Decision Date | 01 May 1928 |
Docket Number | No. 19966.,19966. |
Parties | LEWIS et al. v. KAPLAN et al. |
Court | Court of Appeal of Missouri (US) |
Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court; John W. Calhoun, Judge.
"Not to be officially published."
Action by Jas. A. W. Lewis and others against May Kaplan and others. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants appeal. Motion to dismiss appeal overruled, judgment reversed, and cause remanded, with directions.
Superseding opinion, 300 S. W. 1041.
Marvin E. Boisseau, of St. Louis, for appellants.
W. Scott Hancock and Judson, Green & Henry, all of St. Louis, for respondents.
This is an action to enjoin the erection of a store building on a lot in block No. 3909, in the city of St. Louis, situate at the southwest corner of Boyle and McPherson avenues. The bill was filed on January 20, 1926. A temporary injunction was granted on April 7, 1926. Upon final hearing of the cause, the court entered judgment sustaining plaintiffs' bill and ordering that the temporary injunction be made permanent. From this judgment defendants appeal.
The action was originally brought by Jas. A. W. Lewis, F. B. Chamberlain, Frank W. Corley, R. L. Thompson, Arthur A. Lueke, Winnifred Lueke, and Elizabeth M. Sheble, as plaintiffs. Since the cause has been appealed here, the death of Arthur A. Lueke has been suggested, and the cause has been revived in the name of his administratrix, Winnifred Lueke, who has as such administratrix entered her appearance to the cause in this court. After the death of said Arthur A. Lueke and before the revival of the cause in the name of his administratrix, the cause was argued and submitted here, and thereupon the plaintiffs' motion to dismiss the appeal herein was overruled, and the judgment of the circuit court was reversed and the cause remanded, with directions. The opinion under the former submission, which is reported in (Mo. App.) 300 S. W. at page 1041, was withdrawn, and the judgment rendered thereon was vacated, upon the suggestion of the death of Arthur A. Lueke, and the cause has been again argued and submitted here.
The lot in question fronts about 35 feet on the south side of McPherson avenue, and extends southwardly on the west side of Boyle avenue about 164 feet to an alley. There is a dwelling house on the north portion of the lot fronting on McPherson avenue. On December 3, 1925, Elizabeth M. Sheble was the owner of the property, and Arthur A. Lueke was in possession of the property and occupied the same for residence purposes, under a lease from Elizabeth M. Sheble for a term commencing July 18, 1924, and ending July 18, 1926. Arthur A. Lueke and Winnifred Lueke were husband and wife. Jas. A. W. Lewis, F. B. Chamberlain, Frank W. Corley, and R. L. Thompson are the owners of residence properties in the neighborhood of the Sheble property. Some of these properties are located on the north side, and some on the south side, of McPherson avenue. On December 23, 1925, negotiations resulted in a tentative contract between Elizabeth M. Sheble and May Kaplan for the sale of the Sheble property to May Kaplan, which contract was reduced to writing, as follows:
May Kaplan, desiring to have immediate possession of the south 80 feet of the property and to erect a store building thereon, declined to sign said contract of sale unless Arthur A. Lueke, who held the property under the lease aforesaid, would sign an agreement to allow said Kaplan to have immediate possession of said south 80 feet of the property and to erect a store building thereon. Accordingly, on December 8, 1925, the said Arthur A. Lueke and Elizabeth M. Sheble signed the following agreement, indorsed on the back of said contract of sale:
"This agreement witnesseth: That whereas a certain lease on house and premises, 4300 McPherson, was made and executed by and between Mrs. Elizabeth Sheble, as lessor, and Arthur Lueke, as lessee, on July 18, 1924, and ending July 18, 1926, and whereas lessor has entered...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Civic Ass'n. of Wyoming v. Railway Motor Fuels, Inc., 2196
... ... in violation of Section 1 of the Act. Herrmann v. Kaiser ... (Mo. App.) 85 S.W.2d 928; Lewis v. Kaplan (Mo ... App.) 5 S.W.2d 699; Mathews v. Chambers Power Co ... (Ore.) 159 P. 564; United States v. Workingmen's ... Amalgamated ... ...
-
Majors v. Bush
... ... to create an easement in this respondent. Sanford v ... Kern, 223 Mo. 616; Lewis v. Kaplan, 5 S.W.2d ... 699; Meyers v. Ustick, 243 S.W. 833. (5) The lane ... was a way of necessity and the court in any event did not err ... in ... ...
-
Personal Finance Co. of Missouri v. Day
...to dismiss should be sustained for the reasons stated in the opinion of the Kansas City Court of Appeals reported in 158 S.W.2d 197. Lewis v. Kaplan, supra, deemed to be in therewith was a suit to enjoin the erection of a store building. An injunction was issued. On appeal the case was twic......
-
West Virginia Bd. of Dental Examiners v. Storch
...filing of the bill. United States v. Workingmen's Amalgamated Council of New Orleans et al., C.C., 54 F. 994, 26 L.R.A. 158; Lewis v. Kaplan, Mo.App., 5 S.W.2d 699. Even if the defendant went out of business, it would not prevent the granting of an injunction if one were proper when origina......