Lewis v. McCarthy

Decision Date15 June 1921
Docket Number1992.
CitationLewis v. McCarthy, 274 F. 496 (D. Mass. 1921)
PartiesLEWIS v. McCARTHY et al.
CourtU.S. District Court — District of Massachusetts

William R. Scharton, of Boston, Mass., for petitioner.

The United States Attorney, for defendants.

MORTON District Judge.

This is a petition for the return of an automobile, the property of the petitioner, which is held by the respondents as prohibition enforcement officers. They have moved to dismiss. The case stated in the petition is as follows: The petitioner is the owner of the automobile. On the occasion in question it was taken and used without her knowledge or consent by her chauffeur. He was arrested by a Boston police officer for operating it while under the influence of liquor, and a complaint for that offense is pending against him in the state court. While the petition does not so allege, I infer that there was liquor in the automobile, which was being illegally transported by the chauffeur, because the petition recites that he got liquor and was arraigned before a United States commissioner on the charge of illegal transportation. No proceedings have been instituted for the forfeiture of the automobile; but the case is still pending against the chauffeur for violation of the Volstead Act (41 Stat. 305).

Under the circumstances, the court has no power, in summary proceedings such as these, to order the return of the automobile. Such power exists only over officers of the court,...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
  • State v. District Court of Eighth Jud. Dist.
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • 11 d2 Agosto d2 1925
    ... ... of the Chief of Police, he not being an officer of the court, ... and never having been before the court; Lewis v ... McCarthy, 274 F. 496; In re Shue, 199 F. 282; ... the order being void cannot be made the basis for contempt ... proceedings; in Re ... ...
  • New Hampshire Fire Insurance Co v. Scanlon
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • 25 d1 Abril d1 1960
    ...F. 673; United States v. Farrington, D.C., 17 F.Supp. 702; In re Allen, D.C., 1 F.2d 1020; Sims v. Stuart, D.C., 291 F. 707; Lewis v. McCarthy, D.C, 274 F. 496; United States v. Hee, D.C., 219 F. 1019; In re Chin K. Shue, D.C., 199 F. 282. Cf. Taubel-Scott-Kitzmiller Co. v. Fox, 264 U.S. 42......
  • In re Behrens
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • 3 d1 Março d1 1930
    ...as to prohibition officers, Applybe v. United States, 32 F.(2d) 873 (C. C. A. 9), on rehearing (C. C. A.) 33 F. (2d) 897; Lewis v. McCarthy, 274 F. 496 (D. C. Mass.); United States v. Casino, 286 F. 976, 978 (D. C. S. D. N. Y.). In the case last cited it is "It is clear that the owner of pr......
  • Lindsley v. Werner
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • 23 d1 Dezembro d1 1929
    ... ... like ours. Among them are the following: U.S. v. One Saxon ... Automobile, 257 F. 251, 168 C.C.A. 335; Lewis v. McCarthy (D ... C.) 274 F. 496; State v. Morris, 124 Kan. 143, 257 P. 731; ... U.S. v. Montgomery et al. (D. C.) 289 F. 125; State v. One ... ...
  • Get Started for Free