Lewis v. Metropolitan Transp. Authority
| Decision Date | 11 December 1984 |
| Citation | 485 N.Y.S.2d 252,64 N.Y.2d 670 |
| Parties | , 474 N.E.2d 612 Evelina LEWIS, Appellant, v. The METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY et al., Respondents. |
| Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Bentley Kassal at the Appellate Division (99 A.D.2d 246, 472 N.Y.S.2d 368).
To continue reading
Request your trial
134 cases
-
In re Joint Eastern & Southern Dist. Asbestos Lit.
... ... ; Babcock & Wilcox Company; Bell/Atlas Asbestos Corp.; Port Authority of New York and New Jersey; Nassau County Medical Center, a/d/a ... , 67 N.Y.2d 836, 501 N.Y.S.2d 646, 647, 492 N.E.2d 774, 775 (1986); Lewis v. Metropolitan Transp. Auth., 99 A.D.2d 246, 251, 472 N.Y.S.2d 368, 72 ... ...
-
Cruz v. New York City Transit Authority
...Manhattan R. Co., 112 N.Y. 443, 20 N.E. 383; Lewis v. Metropolitan Transp. Auth., 99 A.D.2d 246, 472 N.Y.S.2d 368, affd. 64 N.Y.2d 670, 485 N.Y.S.2d 252, 474 N.E.2d 612; Boettcher v. Dowling, 243 App.Div. 397, 277 N.Y.S.2d 228, affd. 270 N.Y. 557, 200 N.E. 316; 17 NY Jur 2d, Carriers, §§ 41......
-
Walsh v. Super Value, Inc.
...about it ( see Lewis v. Metropolitan Transp. Auth., 99 A.D.2d 246, 249, 472 N.Y.S.2d 368, affd. for reasons stated below 64 N.Y.2d 670, 485 N.Y.S.2d 252, 474 N.E.2d 612). But not always. It is possible, even for a reasonable person acting reasonably, to create a dangerous or defective condi......
-
Barnett v. City of Yonkers
...also Lewis v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 99 A.D.2d 246, 251, 472 N.Y. S.2d 368, 372 (1st Dep't), aff'd, 64 N.Y.2d 670, 474 N.E.2d 612, 485 N.Y.S.2d 252 (1984) ("condition must have existed for a sufficient period to afford landowner, in the exercise of reasonable care, an opport......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Overruling by implication and the consequent burden upon bench and bar.
...848 N.Y.S.2d at 563. (18) Lewis v. Metro. Transport. Auth., 99 A.D.2d 246, 249, 472 N.Y.S.2d 368, 371 (App. Div. 1st Dep't 1984), aff'd, 64 N.Y.2d 670, 474 N.E.2d 612 (19) Pratt, Hurst & Co. v. Tailer, 186 N.Y. 417, 421, 79 N.E. 328, 329 (1906) ("[I]t is perfectly plain that the landlor......