Lewis v. Mount Greenwood Bank

Decision Date02 December 1980
Docket Number79-2422,Nos. 79-1936,s. 79-1936
Citation46 Ill.Dec. 926,414 N.E.2d 1079,91 Ill.App.3d 481
Parties, 46 Ill.Dec. 926 Oscar LEWIS and Robert Lewis, Plaintiffs-Appellees and Cross-Appellants, v. MOUNT GREENWOOD BANK, Defendant-Appellant and Cross-Appellee.
CourtUnited States Appellate Court of Illinois

John T. Duax, Chicago (Drucker & Duax, Ltd., Chicago, of counsel), for defendant-appellant and cross-appellee.

Walter M. Ketchum, Ltd. and James R. Madler, Chicago (Paul E. Peldyak and James R. Madler, Chicago, of counsel), for plaintiffs-appellees and cross-appellants.

HARTMAN, Justice:

Robert Lewis ("Robert"), owner of a trucking business, his brother Oscar Lewis ("Oscar"), owner of a truck tractor, and Econ, Inc. ("Econ"), owner of a cargo being hauled by Robert, brought suit against defendants Mount Greenwood Bank ("Bank") and Area Truck and Trailer Equipment Co., Inc. ("Area"), alleging that the defendants, individually or jointly, through their agents wrongfully seized two trailers belonging to Robert, the tractor belonging to Oscar, and cargo belonging to Econ on May 18, 1973; and wrongfully seized a trailer belonging to Robert and cargo belonging to Econ on September 25, 1973. A jury verdict of $6,500 compensatory damages and $20,000 punitive damages was returned in favor of Oscar against the Bank and a verdict was returned in favor of the Bank and Area and against Robert and Econ, on which judgments were entered. The Bank appeals in 79-1936 and Robert cross-appeals in 79-2422.

The issues raised by the Bank are that the trial court erred in denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, based upon evidentiary grounds, and in denying its motion for a mistrial, based upon misconduct of plaintiffs' counsel. The issue raised in Robert's cross-appeal is based upon the trial court's denial of his post-trial motion for a new trial, also evidentiary-based. Neither Econ nor Area are parties to this appeal. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse the judgment in favor of Oscar Lewis and against the Bank, and affirm the judgment in favor of the Bank and against Robert Lewis.

We set forth only that evidence which bears upon the disposition of this appeal. Plaintiffs' evidence reveals that in 1972, Oscar purchased a 1965 Dodge tractor for $6,500, which he allowed Robert to use in his business. According to Oscar, in September of 1973, Robert had possession of the tractor until it was at that time repossessed. About one year later, a mechanic, Julius Hudson, repaired damages the tractor received during the repossession. Richard Parker, employed by Robert as a truck driver on September 24, 1973, drove Oscar's 1965 Dodge tractor, when he picked up a cargo of steel from Rolled Steel Corporation. He returned with the cargo to Robert's place of business at the intersection of Madison and Washtenaw Streets in Chicago, and parked there without disengaging the tractor and trailer. Julius Hudson inspected Oscar's Dodge tractor in September 1973 at 2700 W. Madison, and observed that the engine had been overheated, requiring a major overhaul. He repaired the tractor in 1972 or 1973 but was not sure.

Robert testified that in 1972 and 1973, he was in the trucking business, owned three trailers and used his brother Oscar's 1965 Dodge tractor in the business. The trailers were purchased from Area under retail sales installment contracts, which were assigned to the Bank. In April of 1973, he called the Bank and told Ted Altman that he would be a little late with payments due on certain of the Bank contracts on which the trailers were security. Altman told him he saw "no problem." The following day a trailer disappeared. Robert went to Area where he met with Harold Wymer, the Area salesman who had sold him all three trailers. Wymer told him that he would have to pay Area $1,000 to get the trailer back. 1 After he paid the $1,000 to Wymer the trailer was returned to him. On September 24, 1973, he saw this trailer hooked up to Oscar's tractor parked at his place of business. The next morning, after receiving a call from his driver indicating that the tractor and trailer were missing, he called the police and reported the theft. Upon advice of the police, he called the Bank and spoke with Altman, who told him that he had taken the trailer.

Robert then spoke with Wymer, at Area, who told him that the trailer was there. He drove to Area and told Wymer that the tractor had been damaged during the repossession, and Wymer said "that's Shannon." He then went to a police pound on 16th Street and Laramie Avenue, where he examined the tractor. The ignition was hanging out, the window was broken, and it wouldn't start. He had it towed to 2700 W. Madison, where Julius Hudson inspected it and said the engine was "seized up" and needed an overhaul. Because he was unable to afford the work then, it was about nine or ten months later when Hudson ultimately performed the repairs, for which he paid.

On cross-examination by the Bank, Robert acknowledged not making loan payments in February, May, August or September of 1973. On cross-examination by Area, Robert testified that during May of 1973 he was several payments behind and the Marshall and Madden trailers were repossessed. After the September disappearance of the tractor and trailer, he found the tractor around 16th and Laramie in a pound. Secretary of State personnel told him that it had been reported stolen.

Robert Alexander, an assistant vice president of the Bank, called by plaintiffs as an adverse witness, testified that he was not employed by the Bank in 1973, and had no direct knowledge of the transactions at issue. His testimony was limited to 1973 bank records of various repossessions of Robert's trailers. In May of 1973, two of Robert's trailers were repossessed for nonpayments. One contract, secured by a 1965 Marshall trailer, had a balance owing of $2,267.86, on which the $116.75 monthly payments for March, April and May of 1973 had not been made. A second contract, secured by a 1969 King Madden trailer, had a balance owing of $2,962.54, on which payments of $155.66 had not been made for April and May of 1973. A third contract, secured by a 1973 Transcraft trailer, had a balance owing of $5,150.25, on which two payments of $147.15 had not been made. In May of 1973, Ted Altman, the Bank's collection manager, had ordered repossession of these trailers. On examination by the Bank, Alexander testified that the three contract balances due were never paid and the Bank never received the three trailers. On cross-examination he testified that those balances were ultimately reduced to a judgment of approximately $9,000 against Robert. The bank records indicated that the Transcraft trailer had been sold, but it did not indicate to whom. The balance on that contract was paid by Area, but this did not mean that Area was the purchaser. On the other two contracts, balances were still owing.

The Bank's motions for a directed verdict at the close of plaintiffs' case were denied and it then presented its case. Daniel Shannon, a self-employed financial adjuster, testified that in May of 1973, he was retained by the Bank to bring Robert's delinquent account up-to-date. After unsuccessfully attempting to contact Robert, he located and took possession of two trailers. A tractor was attached to one of them. Chicago Police were then present, a usual procedure according to Shannon. The license plates on the tractor and trailer were checked; the former had fictitious plates. He notified a Secretary of State investigator, who then took the tractor into his custody. The investigator removed the tractor to Cicero and Laramie. Shannon thereafter delivered the two trailers to Area. He did not personally take the tractor, although he had earlier stated that he took "the whole thing." He exercises his own discretion as to how to accomplish a repossession; his clients do not give him those details. No one from the Bank or Area was present during the repossession. On cross-examination, Shannon testified that it was May of 1973 when he performed the repossession. Although subpoenaed, he failed to bring his records from May of 1973, stating he was not a very good record keeper.

Frank Wolf testified that in 1973 he was a repossessor for All Auto Recovery. In the summer of 1973, the Bank and Area had given All Auto lists of vehicles to repossess. On September 26, 1973, he located a detached Transcraft trailer belonging to Robert, on Area's list, at 106th and Indianapolis, which he brought to Area.

In rebuttal, Robert testified that he found the tractor in an open lot at 16th and Laramie. On cross-examination by the Bank, he stated he did not know, but was told, that it was a Secretary of State lot. His attention was then drawn to his signed and sworn complaint in which he alleged that Oscar's tractor was repossessed in May of 1973, whereas at trial he testified the tractor was damaged in September of 1973. He responded that it was...

To continue reading

Request your trial
19 cases
  • Dvorak v. Primus Corp.
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • April 25, 1988
    ...to vicarious liability for its negligent acts) rather than an independent contractor. (See, e.g., Lewis v. Mount Greenwood Bank (1980), 91 Ill.App.3d 481, 487, 46 Ill.Dec. 926, 414 N.E.2d 1079 (holding that the determinative factor in distinguishing an independent contractor from a servant ......
  • Lang v. Silva, 1-98-1927.
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • July 29, 1999
    ...the scope of his agency or employment. Moy, 159 Ill.2d at 532, 203 Ill.Dec. 776, 640 N.E.2d 926; Lewis v. Mount Greenwood Bank, 91 Ill.App.3d 481, 487, 46 Ill.Dec. 926, 414 N.E.2d 1079 (1980); Marco v. County of McHenry, 218 Ill.App.3d 503, 505, 161 Ill.Dec. 221, 578 N.E.2d 579 (1991). One ......
  • Yedor v. Centre Properties, Inc.
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • July 12, 1988
    ...same evidence. (Paul Harris Furniture Co. v. Morse (1956), 10 Ill.2d 28, 37-38, 139 N.E.2d 275; Lewis v. Mount Greenwood Bank (1980), 91 Ill.App.3d 481, 486-87, 46 Ill.Dec. 926, 414 N.E.2d 1079; McKinney v. Illinois Power Co. (1960), 26 Ill.App.2d 193, 203, 167 N.E.2d 249; Coffin v. Chicago......
  • Presbrey v. Gillette Co.
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • May 5, 1982
    ...fact inconsistent with the first can be inferred with equal certainty from the same evidence. See Lewis v. Mt. Greenwood Bk., 91 Ill.App.3d 481, 486-87, 46 Ill.Dec. 926, 414 N.E.2d 1079 (1980). We recognize that the rule of non-liability has been relaxed by some courts where the defendant h......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT