Lewis v. State, 45A03-9202-PC-45
Decision Date | 22 July 1992 |
Docket Number | No. 45A03-9202-PC-45,45A03-9202-PC-45 |
Citation | 595 N.E.2d 753 |
Parties | Eddie E. LEWIS, Appellant-Petitioner, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Respondent. |
Court | Indiana Appellate Court |
Susan K. Carpenter, Public Defender, Steven H. Schutte, Deputy Public Defender, Indianapolis, for appellant-petitioner.
Linley E. Pearson, Atty. Gen., Louis E. Ransdell, Deputy Atty. Gen., Indianapolis, for appellee-respondent.
A jury convicted Lewis of First Degree Murder and Murder in the Perpetration of a Felony, and he was sentenced for the felony murder. On direct appeal the supreme court affirmed. Lewis v. State (1979) 272 Ind. 365, 397 N.E.2d 983.
In 1986 Lewis petitioned for post-conviction relief under PCR 1. Hearing was held and on March 26, 1990, the court entered its findings and judgment denying relief. On September 5, 1990, Lewis petitioned to hold his appeal in abeyance to permit filing in the trial court a motion for relief from judgment. This court granted that motion and Lewis petitioned the trial court to vacate its judgment so that he might present the testimony of his trial attorney, who had been unavailable at the time of the post-conviction hearing.
On October 18, 1990 the trial court entered its order withdrawing the findings of fact and conclusions previously entered and vacating its prior order denying relief. A year later, on October 21, 1991 Lewis filed his amended petition for post-conviction relief in which he attempted to assert a number of new grounds for relief. On October 23, 1991 the court entered its order stating that the order of October 18, 1990 The court then ordered the 1991 petition to amend stricken, heard the testimony of trial counsel and entered its order denying relief and ratifying its original findings.
The first contention raised by Lewis on appeal precludes the necessity of addressing his other issues. He asserts the court erred in not permitting him to amend his petition for post-conviction relief and holding a hearing on the amended petition. We are constrained to agree.
Post-conviction Relief Rule 1,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Schiro v. Farley
...murder and felony murder with respect to a single killing. See, e. g., Roche v. State, 596 N. E. 2d 896 (Ind. 1992); Lewis v. State, 595 N. E. 2d 753 (Ind. App. 1992); Hopkins v. State, 582 N. E. 2d 345 (Ind. 9. The Court's suggestion that the jury may have reached "a guilty verdict on Coun......
-
Wells v. Hickman
... ... While our state has adopted the first three of the four common law exceptions, we have not yet recognized the ... ...
-
Jackson v. State
...and the petitioner shall be given leave to amend the petition as a matter of right." (Emphasis added). See also Lewis v. State, 595 N.E.2d 753 (Ind.Ct.App.1992). Jackson could amend the petition at any time prior to entry of judgment as a matter of right. The third amendment filed in August......
-
Davis v. LeCuyer, 49A02-0501-CV-33.<SMALL><SUP>1</SUP></SMALL>
... ... II. Is negligent supervision a separate tort in the State of Indiana as to which a person may be liable to a minor in his care? ... We ... ...