Lewis v. Warden of Md. Penitentiary, 20

Decision Date04 December 1953
Docket NumberNo. 20,20
PartiesLEWIS v. WARDEN OF MARYLAND PENITENTIARY.
CourtMaryland Court of Appeals

Before SOBELOFF, C. J., and DELAPLAINE, COLLINS, HENDERSON, and HAMMOND, JJ.

HENDERSON, Judge.

This is an application for leave to appeal from the denial of a writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner was convicted in the Circuit Court for Caroline County upon an indictment containing counts of larceny and receiving stolen goods. Nol pros was entered to the first count and there was a plea of guilty to the second. Petitioner was sentenced to eight years. He contends that he was erroneously sentenced under the first count. The record does not support the contention, and in any event the sentence under the second count would be effective. Cf. Bowen v. Warden, Md. House of Correction, Md., 92 A.2d 384. He also alleges that the commitment erroneously shows conviction on the first count. If true, this would call for correction of the commitment but not for his release. State ex rel. Justice v. Warden of Md. Penitentiary, Md., 97 A.2d 906.

Petitioner also contends that his arrest was illegal, that he was held in jail an unreasonable length of time before trial, and that there was 'fraud, collusion and trickery' on the part of the State. On the first two points we have held repeatedly that they cannot be reviewed on habeas corpus. On the last point, the petitioner does not supply any details of the charge nor any proof. Cf. Hickman v. Warden, Md. House of Correction, Md., 99 A.2d 730; Edwards v. Warden, Md. Penitentiary, 198 Md. 686, 85 A.2d 49; Peoples v. Warden, Md. Penitentiary, 198 Md. 688, 84 A.2d 695.

Application denied, with costs.

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Presley v. Peppersack, 7042.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • November 9, 1955
    ...Barr v. Warden, 200 Md. 657, 90 A.2d 216; nor can the legality of arrest — see Spence v. Warden, 204 Md. 661, 103 A.2d 345; Lewis v. Warden, 203 Md. 676, 100 A.2d 803; Cumberland v. Warden, 205 Md. 646, 109 A.2d 66; nor can his allegations that the police used force and threats to gain incr......
  • Presley v. Warden of Md. Penitentiary, 18
    • United States
    • Maryland Court of Appeals
    • December 8, 1954
    ...Barr v. Warden, 200 Md. 657, 90 A.2d 216; nor can the legality of arrest--see Spence v. Warden, 204 Md. 661, 103 A.2d 345; Lewis v. Warden, 203 Md. 676, 100 A.2d 803; Cumberland v. Warden, Md., 109 A.2d 66; nor can his allegations that the police used force and threats to gain incriminating......
  • Whitley v. Warden of Md. House of Correction, 23
    • United States
    • Maryland Court of Appeals
    • February 9, 1956
    ...against petitioner were colored and clearly is without substance or merit. Bell v. Warden, 207 Md. 618, 113 A.2d 482; Lewis v. Warden, 203 Md. 676, 100 A.2d 803. Application denied, with ...
  • Wilson v. Warden, Md. House of Correction
    • United States
    • Maryland Court of Appeals
    • April 4, 1956
    ...illegally arrested on December 3, 1954. The question whether a prisoner's arrest was illegal cannot be reviewed on habeas corpus. Lewis v. Warden, 203 Md. 676, 100 A.2d 803; Spence v. Warden, 204 Md. 661, 103 A.2d 345; Smith v. Warden, 207 Md. 628, 114 A.2d 892, 893. The petitioner further ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT