Liberian Cmty. Ass'n of Conn. v. Lamont

Citation970 F.3d 174
Decision Date14 August 2020
Docket NumberNo. 17-1558,August Term 2017,17-1558
Parties LIBERIAN COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION OF CONNECTICUT, on behalf of themselves and those similarly situated, Louise Mensah-Sieh, on behalf of herself and her minor children B.D. and S.N., on behalf of themselves and those similarly situated, Victor Sieh, on behalf of themselves and those similarly situated, Emmanuel Kamara, on behalf of themselves and those similarly situated, Assunta Nimley-Phillips, on behalf of themselves and those similarly situated, Laura Skrip, on behalf of themselves and those similarly situated, Ryan Boyko, on behalf of themselves and those similarly situated, Esther Yalartai, on behalf of themselves and those similarly situated, Bishop Harmon Yalartai, on behalf of themselves and those similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Ned LAMONT, Governor, Deidre S. Gifford, Acting Commissioner of Public Health, Jewel Mullen, Former Commissioner of Public Health, Defendants-Appellees.
CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)

For Plaintiffs-Appellants: D'Laney Gielow (Michael J. Wishnie, Amy Kapczynski, Dana Bolger, Kyle Edwards, Megha Ram, on the briefs), Jerome N. Frank Legal Services Organization, Yale Law School, New Haven, CT. Jeremy Ershow (Susan J. Kohlmann, Jeremy M. Creelan, Irene M. Ten Cate, on the briefs), Jenner & Block LLP, New York, NY. (Robert M. Palumbos, Duane Morris LLP, Philadelphia, PA, for George J. Annas, Jennifer Bard, Leo Beletsky, Micah Berman, Scott Burris, Erwin Chemerinsky, Linda C. Fentiman, Lance Gable, Brandon Garrett, Lawrence O. Gostin, Jonathan Hafetz, Helen Hershkoff, Peter D. Jacobson, Jonathan Kahn, Renee M. Landers, Sylvia A. Law, Jenny S. Martinez, Seema Mohapatra, Burt Neuborne, Wendy Parmet, Aziz Rana, Judith Resnik, Kermit Roosevelt, Charity Scott, and Stephen I. Vladeck, as amici curiae), (Kim E. Rinehart, Wiggin and Dana, LLP, New Haven, CT, for Yale New Haven Health Services Corporation, Hartford Hospital, The Hospital of Central Connecticut, Backus Hospitals, MidState Medical Center, Windham Hospital, Saint Francis Hospital and Medical Center, Johnson Memorial Hospital, Saint Mary's Hospital, Bristol Hospital, and Western Connecticut Health Network, Inc., as amici curiae), (Dan Barrett, ACLU Foundation of Connecticut, Hartford, CT, and Esha Bhandari, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, New York, NY, for American Civil Liberties Union, American Civil Liberties Union of Connecticut, Doctors Without Borders/ Medécins Sans Frontières USA as amici curiae), (Ann O'Leary and Kathleen Hartnett, Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, Palo Alto, CA, and David A. Barrett and Yotam Barkai, Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, New York, NY, for Mark Barnes, Leana Wen, and Jeffrey Duchin as amici curiae)

For Defendants-Appellees: Robert J. Deichert, Assistant Attorney General, for George Jepsen, Attorney General, Hartford, CT.

Before: Winter, Livingston, and Chin, Circuit Judges.

Judge Chin concurs in part and dissents in part in a separate opinion.

Debra Ann Livingston, Circuit Judge:

This case arises out of the Ebola

epidemic that ravaged West Africa between 2014 and 2016. In response to the epidemic, then-Governor Dannel Malloy declared a public health emergency in the State of Connecticut. The declaration authorized Dr. Jewel Mullen, then-Commissioner of Public Health, to isolate or quarantine individuals whom she believed had been exposed to or could transmit the Ebola virus. She ordered twenty-one-day quarantines for two Ph.D. candidates—Ryan Boyko and Laura Skrip—and six members of the Mensah-Sieh family who had recently emigrated from Liberia. None of the quarantined individuals were infected with Ebola.

Boyko, Skrip, the Mensah-Siehs, Assunta Nimley-Phillips, Bishop Harmon Yalartai, Esther Yalartai, and the Liberian Community Association of Connecticut (collectively, "Appellants") filed a putative class-action suit in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Covello, J. ) challenging the state officials’ actions.2 They primarily alleged violations of their substantive and procedural due process rights and the Fourth Amendment. The defendants—the Governor and Commissioners of Public Health—moved to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b). As to these constitutional claims, the district court dismissed the claims for injunctive relief under Rule 12(b)(1), for lack of standing, and dismissed the claims for damages under Rule 12(b)(6), on the basis of Dr. Mullen's assertion of qualified immunity.3 The court also denied the motion for class certification. We agree with the conclusions reached by the district court as to standing and qualified immunity and need not reach the issue of class certification. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment but REMAND with instructions to the district court that the judgment be amended to reflect that the state law claims were dismissed without prejudice.

BACKGROUND
I. Factual Background4
A. The 2014 Ebola

Outbreak

Ebola

"is spread through direct physical contact with the bodily fluids of a symptomatic person, the body of a person who has died from Ebola, or objects contaminated with the virus, such as used needles."

J.A. 26.5 Once an individual has contracted the virus, "[t]he incubation period (the time from infection to onset of symptoms) is usually four to nine days but can range from two to twenty-one days." Id. "Symptoms include fever, headache, joint and muscle aches, diarrhea, and vomiting." Id.

The first victim of the 2014 Ebola

outbreak may well have been a young boy from a village "deep within the Guinean forest region" who died in December 2013.6 The disease thereafter spread, "kill[ing] the boy's mother, then his 3-year-old sister, then his grandmother."7 In the months that followed, dozens more died as the disease moved between relatives, friends, and health care workers. Soon, the virus had "spread rapidly throughout Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone." J.A. 26. On March 23, 2014, "the World Health Organization (‘WHO’) announced an outbreak of Ebola in West Africa." Id. Over the next twenty-two months, more than 28,000 individuals were diagnosed with Ebola. Over 11,000 died. This was the largest Ebola outbreak in history, yet those afflicted resided almost exclusively in Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone. Outside those three countries, fewer than forty cases of Ebola emerged.

During the outbreak, to prevent the spread of the disease in the United States, both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ("CDC") and the Department of Homeland Security ("DHS") released policy guidance on how to manage the flow of people from West Africa. The CDC initially "recommended only self-monitoring or active monitoring for twenty-one days, and recommended no movement restrictions or quarantine" "[f]or asymptomatic individuals returning from West Africa with ‘no risk’ or ‘low risk’ of exposure."8 J.A. 27. On October 8, 2014, the CDC and the DHS jointly "announced a safety plan" pursuant to which individuals "entering the United States from Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone" were directed "to one of five ports of entry." J.A. 28. On arrival, trained staff screened travelers for signs of illness and inquired about their health and possible prior exposures. If a passenger "required further evaluation or monitoring, federal officers referred those travelers to the appropriate state or local public health authority. Travelers with no symptoms, fever, or a known history of exposure received health information for self-monitoring and were approved to exit the airport." J.A. 28. After the safety plan was announced, the CDC also revised its prior guidance. The new guidance, issued on October 27, "recommended ‘no restrictions on travel, work, public conveyances, or congregate gatherings’ for asymptomatic individuals ... who had been in an affected country but had no known exposure." J.A. 30.

Over a year and a half after the virus was first identified, the WHO declared Sierra Leone Ebola-free on November 7, 2015. Guinea and Liberia followed on December 29, 2015, and January 14, 2016, respectively. Despite these declarations, experts cautioned that these three nations "remain[ed] at high risk of future Ebola

outbreaks." Id. Nevertheless, on March 29, 2016, the WHO deemed the "Public Health Emergency of International Concern" over. J.A. 111. Since the end of the Ebola crisis in West Africa, there have been at least ten flareups or small outbreaks of Ebola in West Africa, and multiple outbreaks in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

B. Connecticut's Response

Under Connecticut state law, the state government acquires the authority to quarantine if the Governor declares a public health emergency. Conn. Gen. Stat. § 19a-131a. Once the Governor makes such a declaration, he may authorize the State Public Health Commissioner (the "Commissioner") to quarantine or isolate people "whom the commissioner has reasonable grounds to believe" are or could be infected with a communicable disease. Id. § 19a-131b(a). The Commissioner is to issue quarantine and isolation orders only when they are "necessary and the least restrictive alternative to protect or preserve the public health." Id. Numerous statutory factors guide the issuance of a quarantine or isolation order. Id. § 19a-131b(b). The Commissioner must also comply with various procedural requirements, including informing the quarantined or isolated individuals in writing, id. § 19a-131b(c), limiting the order to a renewable twenty-day period, id. , and informing individuals that they have a right to a hearing to challenge their quarantine order and a right to an attorney at this hearing at the State's expense, id. § 19a-131b(d).

Turning to the actions of the Governor of Connecticut ("Governor")9 and then-Commissioner of the Connecticut Department of Public Health Dr. Jewel Mullen (collectively with Acting Commissioner Deidre S. Gifford, "Appellees"), on October 7, 2014, the Governor...

To continue reading

Request your trial
75 cases
  • In re N.Y.C. Policing During Summer 2020 Demonstrations
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • July 9, 2021
    ...opportunity – preferably at the outset of the case – and may be resolved on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion. Liberian Cmty. Ass'n of Conn. v. Lamont , 970 F.3d 174, 186 (2d Cir. 2020).The best explanation I have ever read of the confounding doctrine of qualified immunity is found in the Second Circu......
  • Neary v. Weichert
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • September 25, 2020
    ...of litigants empowered to maintain a lawsuit in federal court to seek redress for a legal wrong.’ " Liberian Cmty. Ass'n of Conn. v. Lamont , 970 F.3d 174, 183–84 (2d Cir. 2020) (quoting Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins , ––– U.S. ––––, 136 S. Ct. 1540, 1547, 194 L.Ed.2d 635 (May 16, 2016) ). In orde......
  • McKinney v. City of Middletown
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • September 26, 2022
    ...authority’ or ‘a robust consensus of cases of persuasive authority’ " have recognized the right at issue. Liberian Cmty. Assoc. of Conn. v. Lamont , 970 F.3d 174, 186 (2d Cir. 2020) (quoting Ashcroft v. al-Kidd , 563 U.S. 731, 741-42, 131 S.Ct. 2074, 179 L.Ed.2d 1149 (2011) ). Although we d......
  • FurnitureDealer.net v. Amazon.com
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Minnesota
    • March 25, 2022
    ...Corelogic never addressed whether a defendant's own infringement satisfied the second scienter requirement or § 1202(b). Accord Mango, 970 F.3d at 174. [24] FDN makes a brief argument that the indemnification clause in the agreement between Amazon and Coaster also presents a triable issue o......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • THE "ESSENTIAL" FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE.
    • United States
    • Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy Vol. 44 No. 3, June 2021
    • June 22, 2021
    ...Id. at 75 (Roberts, C.J., dissenting). (29.) CONN. GEN. STAT. [section] I9a-131b (2012). (30.) Liberian Cmty. Ass'n of Conn. v. Lamont, 970 F.3d 174, 180 (2d Cir. (31.) N.Y. EXEC. LAW [section] 29-a (2020). (32.) Id. (33.) Id. (34.) Agudath Israel of Am. v. Cuomo, 983 F.3d 620, 625 (2d Cir.......
  • JACOBSON 2.0: POLICE POWER IN THE TIME OF COVID-19.
    • United States
    • Albany Law Review Vol. 84 No. 4, December 2021
    • December 22, 2021
    ...Twentieth and Twenty-First century legal challenges to mandatory vaccination requirements); Liberian Cmty. Ass'n of Connecticut v. Lamont, 970 F.3d 174, 178 (2d Cir. 2020) (affirming dismissal of constitutional challenges to state Ebola quarantine policies); Hickox v. Christie, 205 F. Supp.......
  • Confusion in the Time of COVID: The Supreme Court's Lack of Clarification in Balancing a Public Health Emergency and the Constitutional Right to Free Exercise.
    • United States
    • Missouri Law Review Vol. 86 No. 2, March 2021
    • March 22, 2021
    ...of the people, are adapted to prevent the spread of contagious disease." Id. at 35. (95.) Liberian Cmty. Ass'n of Connecticut v. Lamont, 970 F.3d 174 (2d Cir. 2020); Hickox v. Christie, 205 F. Supp. 3d 579 (D.N.J. (96.) No. CV-2014-36, (Me. Dist. Ct., Aroostook, Oct. 31, 2014), https://supr......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT