Liberty Cent. Trust Co. v. Greenbrier College for Women
Citation | 50 F.2d 424 |
Decision Date | 09 January 1931 |
Docket Number | No. 2786.,2786. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Southern District of West Virginia |
Parties | LIBERTY CENT. TRUST CO. et al. v. GREENBRIER COLLEGE FOR WOMEN et al. |
W. C. Revercomb, of Charleston, W. Va., and S. M. Austin and J. S. McWhorter, both of Lewisburg, W. Va., for complainants.
H. B. Lee and W. Elliott Nefflen, both of Charleston, W. Va., R. A. Blessing, of Point Pleasant, W. Va., and J. H. White, of Lewisburg, W. Va., for defendants.
Before NORTHCOTT, Circuit Judge, and McCLINTIC and GLENN, District Judges.
Findings of Fact.
This is a suit in equity seeking to enjoin the state road commission of West Virginia, a corporation, the county court of Greenbrier county, a corporation, and Echols Bros., Incorporated, from building a road over and on certain real estate situated in Greenbrier county, W. Va. The legal title to this real estate is vested in the Greenbrier College for Women, a corporation.
Plaintiffs are citizens of the state of Missouri, and are trustees under a deed of trust, in which the real estate in question was conveyed to them in trust to secure the payment of bonds issued upon said real estate in the amount of $167,000. The property conveyed by the deed of trust is not sufficient in present value to pay the said sum of $167,000. The state road commission was proposing, under the statutes of West Virginia, to at once enter upon and take possession of the right of way over the real estate in question, pending condemnation proceedings. The proposed road is a part of the state road system of West Virginia and a part of the road across the entire state, known as the "Midland Trail," itself a national road. It is contended by the plaintiffs that the statutes under which the state road commission is acting are unconstitutional, as being in violation of the "due process" clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, and also in violation of the "just compensation" clause of section 9 of article 3 of the Constitution of West Virginia.
The suit was brought in the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of West Virginia, the judge of which court granted a temporary restraining order, and proceeded to convene a three-judge court under section 266 of the Judicial Code as amended (section 380, title 28, USCA).
Under date of August 6, 1930, a written notice was addressed to Judge C. W. Campbell, president of the board of trustees of the Greenbrier College for Women, stating that the state road commission and its contractors and agents were entering upon the lands of the Greenbrier College for Women for the purpose of constructing a state road, and that the county court would apply within sixty days from the service of the notice to the circuit court of Greenbrier county for the appointment of commissioners to assess the damages to the lands. This notice was signed by the county court of Greenbrier county by Julius K. Monroe, county road engineer. At the time of the serving of this notice, the county court of Greenbrier county had entered no order of record authorizing such proceeding by the county road engineer. The judge of the District Court, on September 6, 1930, granted the restraining order prayed for, and the matter was set down for hearing on September 12, 1930. On that date a second restraining order was issued, and the cause again set down for hearing on September 20, 1930, at which time an amended bill was tendered by the plaintiffs, and the defendants filed a written motion to dismiss the original and amended bills, which motion was taken under advisement by the court. The court continued the restraining order in force, and in October, 1930, after filing a written memorandum, amended the order so as to permit the state road commission, the county court of Greenbrier county, and Echols Bros., to proceed with the building of said road, according to law.
Thereafter the state road commission requested the county court of Greenbrier county, in accordance with the state statutes, to furnish the right of way through the grounds of the Greenbrier College for Women. The county court of Greenbrier county refused to furnish such right of way by an order entered, and thereupon the state road commission, acting under section 31 of chapter 6, of the Acts of West Virginia Legislature of 1923, served a notice on the president of Greenbrier College for Women that they were going to enter upon the lands in question and build the road. The plaintiff thereupon filed their supplemental bill, and asked for an injunction restraining the state road commission from further entering upon the lands of Greenbrier College for Women. The court granted the restraining order until the matter could be heard before the court as at present constituted.
Conclusions of Law.
Section 31 of chapter 6 of the Acts of West Virginia Legislature of 1923 reads as follows:
Section 138 of chapter 6 of the Acts of West Virginia Legislature of 1923, under which the state road commission proceeded to act upon refusal of the county court of Greenbrier county, reads as follows:
Sec. 138. Establishment of County — District Roads; Compensation to Landowners.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State by State Road Commission v. Professional Realty Co.
...its exercise is shown to have been arbitrary, capricious, fraudulent or in bad faith. In the case of Liberty Central Trust Co. v. Greenbrier College for Women, D.C., 50 F.2d 424, 429, 429, affirmed 283 U.S. 800, 51 S.Ct. 493, 75 L.Ed. 1422, which involved a suit to enjoin the state road com......
-
United States v. A Certain Tract or Parcel of Land, 155.
...Co., 302 U.S. 134, 147, 58 S.Ct. 208, 82 L.Ed. 155, 114 A.L.R. 318; 29 C.J.S., Eminent Domain, §§ 2, 3. 10 Liberty Cent. Trust Co. v. Greenbrier College, D.C., 50 F.2d 424, 429; Sweet v. Rechel, 159 U.S. 380, 16 S. Ct. 43, 40 L.Ed. 188; Joslin Mfg. Co. v. Providence, 262 U.S. 668, 677, 43 S......
-
In re Lookout Mountain Hotel Co.
... ... , the petition for foreclosure of a deed of trust conveying Georgia land to secure $650,000 of ... ...
-
Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. Latimer
...379, 57 S.Ct. 578, 81 L.Ed. 703, 108 A.L.R. 1330; Nev-Cal Elec. Co. v. Imperial Irr. Dist., 9 Cir., 85 F.2d 886; Liberty Trust Co. v. Greenbrier College, D. C., 50 F.2d 424, affirmed in 283 U.S. 800, 51 S.Ct. 493, 75 L.Ed. The original policy, the requested mode of settlement, and the suppl......