Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Lee, 9522.
| Decision Date | 08 March 1941 |
| Docket Number | No. 9522.,9522. |
| Parties | LIBERTY MUT. INS. CO. v. LEE. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
T. J. Blackwell, Ernest L. Duhaime, and W. H. Walker, Jr., all of Miami, Fla., for appellant.
Lilburn R. Railey, of Miami, opposed.
Before SIBLEY, HOLMES, and McCORD, Circuit Judges.
The case made by the petition is this: Irene Lee, a small child of whom Earl William Lee and Odile Lee, citizens of Florida, claim to be the parents, was killed by a truck driven by Henry Mike and belonging to Kinsman's, Incorporated, a Florida corporation. The truck owner had liability insurance to the amount of $5,000 on the truck with Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a Massachusetts corporation. A representative of the Insurance Company obtained from the parents a release under seal of all claims against Kinsman's, Incorporated, and Henry Mike, for $225 recited to have been paid by Kinsman's, Incorporated. The father sued Kinsman's, Incorporated, for $25,000 damages in a State Court. Kinsman's, Incorporated, pleaded the release as a defense. The Insurance Company then filed in the District Court of the United States the present petition against the father and mother for a declaratory decree, asking the court to declare their marital status and whether either was a proper beneficiary under the Florida statutes of the claim for the child's death; and whether the exhibited release did not bar and extinguish any right or cause of action either may have had against the releasee. An injunction was also asked against the prosecution of the suit in the State court. The parents contended below and contend here that there was no controversy between them and the Insurance Company which would authorize a declaratory decree, and if there was, Kinsman's, Incorporated, was an indispensable party to its settlement, and the jurisdiction to try the issues presented in the petition was in the State court and not in the District Court. The case went to a master, who found the release to have been fraudulently obtained, and recommended that the petition be dismissed at the petitioner's cost. The decree confirmed the report and dismissed the case. The Insurance Company appeals.
A right decree was rendered, but it ought to be rested not on the invalidity of the release, but on the impropriety of thus trying its validity at the instance of the Insurance Company. The claim made by the parents was...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Vanguard Ins. Co. v. Townsend
...So.2d 332 (Fla.1967); New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Intercity Supply Corp., 212 So.2d 110 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968); Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Lee, 117 F.2d 735 (5th Cir.1941), appeal dismissed, 313 U.S. 601, 61 S.Ct. 1087, 85 L.Ed. 1552 An additional reason for disallowing Vanguard's decla......
-
Firemen's Ins. Co. of Newark, New Jersey v. Burch
...v. Semple, 407 Pa. 572, 180 A.2d 925 (1962); Burns v. Hartford Acc. & Indemn. Co., 157 So.2d 84 (Fla.App.1963); Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Lee, 117 F.2d 735 (5th Cir. 1941); 20 Am.Jur. 436 Courts, § 75; 21 C.J.S. Courts § 36, p. While other jurisdictions possibly having different const......
-
Country Ins. Co. v. Agricultural Development, Inc., 15296
...v. Semple, 407 Pa. 572, 180 A.2d 925 (1962); Burns v. Hartford Acc. & Indemn. Co., 175 So.2d 84 (Fla.App.1963); Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Lee, 117 F.2d 735 (5th Cir.1941); 20 Am.Jur. 436, Courts, § 75; 21 C.J.S. Courts § 36, p. Firemen's Ins. Co. of Newark, New Jersey v. Burch, 442 S.......
-
Pennsylvania Casualty Co. v. Thornton
...whom are citizens of the State of Alabama. Although the facts are different, the principle laid down in the case of Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Lee, 5 Cir., 117 F.2d 735, 736, applies here. There the Court "Their controversy is one between citizens of the same State and triable in the State co......