Lieb v. Shelby Iron Co.

Decision Date05 January 1893
PartiesLIEB v. SHELBY IRON CO. ET AL.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Appeal from circuit court, Shelby county; Leroy F. Box, Judge.

Action for false imprisonment by Morris Lieb against the Shelby Iron Company and G. L. Grant, deputy sheriff. Judgment for defendants. Plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

A. P. Longshore, for appellant.

Peters, Wilson & Lyman, for appellees.

McCLELLAN, J.

The original complaint contained only a count for false imprisonment. A count for malicious prosecution was added by amendment; but it appears from the judgment entry that the plaintiff, by leave of the court, again amended the complaint "by striking therefrom the count for malicious prosecution," so that the case was tried solely on the count for false imprisonment. The evidence was free from conflict to the effect that the plaintiff was arrested and constructively imprisoned by a lawful officer, in obedience to the mandate of a warrant which was regular on its face, and which had been issued by a justice of the peace in a case and upon an affidavit charging an offense of which the justice had jurisdiction, at least to the end of issuing process for the arrest and detention of the alleged offender. These facts constituted a complete defense to the action, and the court properly gave the affirmative charge for the defendants. Rhodes v. King, 52 Ala. 272; 2 Brick. Dig. p. 239; 7 Amer. & Eng. Enc. Law, pp. 664, 689.

Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Kittler v. Kelsch
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • December 29, 1927
    ...86 Ga. 238, 12 S. E. 361;Knight v. Railway Co., 9 C. C. A. 376, 61 F. 87;Finley v. Gutter Co., 99 Mo. 559, 13 S. W. 87;Leib v. Shelby Iron Co., 97 Ala. 626, 12 So. 67;Pratt v. Brown, 80 Tex. 608, 16 S. W. 443;Kent v. Miles, 65 Vt. 582, 27 A. 194;Hobbs v. Ray, 18 R. I. 84, 25 A. 694;Murphy v......
  • King v. Robertson
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • October 12, 1933
    ...to be arrested in the warrant was therefore justified. T. C. I. & R. R. Co. v. Butler, supra; Emerson v. Lowe Mfg. Co., supra; Leib v. Shelby Iron Co., supra. We add, however, that if a warrant does not justify its execution, it may nevertheless be sufficient as a reasonable cause to believ......
  • Atwood v. Atwater
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • January 2, 1895
    ... ... 529; Marks v ... Sullivan, supra; Hobbs v. Ray, 25 A ... 694; Leib v. Shelby Iron Co., 97 Ala. 626, 12 So ... 67; Henke v. McCord, 55 Iowa 378, 7 N.W. 623; ... Erskine v ... ...
  • Nolen v. Jones
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • November 15, 1917
    ... ... said count for false imprisonment. Leib v. Shelby ... Co., 97 Ala. 626, 12 So. 67; Sou. Car Co. v ... Adams, 131 Ala. 157, 32 So. 503; Emerson v ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT