Life & Casualty Ins. Co. of Tennessee v. Womack, 8 Div. 696.
| Decision Date | 03 October 1933 |
| Docket Number | 8 Div. 696. |
| Citation | Life & Casualty Ins. Co. of Tennessee v. Womack, 151 So. 881, 26 Ala.App. 6 (Ala. App. 1933) |
| Parties | LIFE & CASUALTY INS. CO. OF TENNESSEE v WOMACK. |
| Court | Alabama Court of Appeals |
Rehearing Denied Nov. 7, 1933.
Appeal from Law and Equity Court, Lauderdale County; Orlan B. Hill Judge.
Action on a policy of life insurance by John B. Womack against the Life and Casualty Insurance Company of Tennessee. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
Affirmed.
Certiorari denied by Supreme Court in Life & Casualty Insurance Co of Tennessee v. Womack, 151 So. 880.
Moreau P. Estes, of Nashville, Tenn., for appellant.
H. D. Jones and Fred S. Parnell, both of Florence, for appellee.
The plaintiff sues to recover under a policy of life insurance issued by defendant on August 24, 1931, insuring the life of Alice B. Womack, in which policy plaintiff was named as the beneficiary.
The policy was issued and delivered to the insured on August 24 1931, and the premium due was paid, and on September 30 1931, insured died, of which death due proof was made to defendant as required by the policy.
As a part of the contract of insurance were the following conditions: "No obligation is assumed by the company prior to the date hereof, nor unless on said date the assured is alive and in sound health"; and There was also in said policy a provision as follows: "Limitation of Insurance, If before the date hereof, the assured has been rejected for insurance by this or any other Company, Order or Association or before said date has had any pulmonary disease, pneumonia, chronic bronchitis, cancer, sarcoma, disease of the heart, liver or kidneys, or if the assured has within two years before the date hereof been attended by a physician for any serious disease or complaint, the Company's liability shall be restricted to the amount equal to the sum of the premiums paid hereon." These provisions as above set out were made the basis for four pleas by way of defense, and tender was made of the amount of the premiums...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Snellings v. Jones
... ... 301 SNELLINGS v. JONES. 4 Div. 972.Alabama Court of AppealsOctober 28, 1947 ... R. Co., 187 ... Ala. 480, 65 So. 397; Life & Casualty Ins. Co. of ... Tennessee v. Womack, ... Alabama Chemical Co. v. Hall, 212 Ala. 8, 101 So ... 456. Since in our opinion we cannot ... ...
-
Madison Limestone Co. v. McDonald
...Kinnon v. Louisville & Nashville, R. Co., 187 Ala. 480, 65 So. 397; Freeman v. Blount, 172 Ala. 655, 55 So. 293; Life & Casualty Ins. Co. v. Womack, 26 Ala.App. 6, 151 So. 881, certiorari denied 228 Ala. 70, 151 So. Assignment of error No. 10 is based on a ruling which needs no discussion. ......
-
Christ v. Spizman
... ... 586 CHRIST v. SPIZMAN. 6 Div. 560.Alabama Court of AppealsMarch 16, 1948 ... wanton. Assignments of error 2, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, ... 15, 16 and 17 deal ... R. Co., 187 ... Ala. 480, 65 So. 397; Life & Casualty Ins. Co. of ... Tennessee v. Womack, ... ...
-
Benich v. Stewart
...36 So.2d 599 34 Ala.App. 61 BENICH v. STEWART. 8 Div. 666.Alabama Court of AppealsAugust 3, 1948 ... R. Co., 187 ... Ala. 480, 65 So. 397; Life & Casualty Ins. Co. of ... Tennessee v. Womack, ... ...