Ligare v. City of Chicago.
Decision Date | 31 October 1891 |
Parties | LIGARE v. CITY OF CHICAGO. |
Court | Illinois Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from superior court, Cook county; JOHN P. ALTGELD, Judge.
This is a petition by the city of Chicago to condemn land under two city ordinances. The condemnation was ordered as prayed for. George A. Ligare, one of the owners of land sought to be taken, appeals. Reversed.
The first ordinance provides as follows: * * *’
The second of said ordinances is as follows: C. C. Bonney and R. S. Thompson, for appellant.
E. H. Gary, for appellee.
It is, to our minds, clear that both ordinances before us in this case are but parts of a single and entire scheme. They were adopted on the same day, and the former expressly refers to, and is by its terms dependent upon, the adoption and enforcement of the latter; and it requires that the entire cost and expense of enforcing both ordinances, and all damages which may be adjudged against the city by reason of their being adopted and enforced, shall be paid by the railroad company. Moreover, the attempt to widen Archer avenue for the limited distance, and in the peculiar manner, described in the second ordinance is manifestly to meet a local want in that respect; and the first ordinance conclusively shows that that local want is space for laying down additional railroad tracks, and nothing else. It is also of some significance, as confirmatory of this view, that the petition for condemnation alleges that the second ordinance contemplates the closing and filling up of Ogden slip, and that can only be upon the assumption that the first ordinance is supplemental to the second; for Ogden slip is not mentioned or referred to,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Washington Water Power Co. v. Waters
... ... 429, 107 N.W. 405, 5 L. R. A., ... N. S., 638, 7 Ann. Cas. 1182; Ligare v. City of ... Chicago, 139 Ill. 46, 32 Am. St. 179, 28 N.E. 934; ... United States v. Rauers, ... ...
-
Trueman v. Village of St. Maries
... ... official capacity, or on behalf of the state, or any county, ... or city, is a party plaintiff or defendant, no bond, written ... undertaking or security can be required ... demages by reason thereof. ( Ligare v. City of ... Chicago, 139 Ill. 46, 32 Am. St. 179, 28 N.E. 934; ... Schade Brewing Co. v ... ...
-
Grand Trunk & W. Ry. Co. v. City of South Bend
...Salt Lake Co., 9 Utah, 31, 33 Pac. 229, 24 L. R. A. 610;Wilder v. Aurora, etc., Co., 216 Ill. 493, 75 N. E. 194;Ligare v. Chicago, 139 Ill. 46, 28 N. E. 934, 32 Am. St. Rep. 179;Williams v. Electric Co. (C. C.) 41 Fed. 556; C., B. & Q. Co. v. Illinois, 200 U. S. 561, 26 Sup. Ct. 341, 50 L. ......
-
Chesapeake & Potomac Tel. Co. v. City of Morgantown, 11000
...have no franchise and which are subject to the terms and provisions of the Ordinance. The plaintiff also relies upon Ligare v. City of Chicago, 139 Ill. 46, 28 N.E. 934, in which the Court held that a municipality has no power to condemn land for a street for the express purpose of giving a......