Lightner Investigators, Inc. v. Goodwin
Citation | 447 So.2d 679 |
Parties | LIGHTNER INVESTIGATORS, INC., and Tom Elliott v. Patricia Lynn GOODWIN, Administratrix of the Estate of Lucy Goodwin, Deceased. 82-1112. |
Decision Date | 24 February 1984 |
Court | Supreme Court of Alabama |
Chris S. Christ, Birmingham, for appellants.
William H. Atkinson of, Fite, Davis & Atkinson, Hamilton, for appellee.
This is an appeal from a denial of an A.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion, which motion sought to set aside a default judgment against Lightner Investigators, Inc., and Tom Elliott (Defendants/Appellants) in the amount of $125,000. We reverse and remand.
Sandy Craig, an employee of Lightner Investigators, Inc., purportedly received instructions from Mary Redmond, an employee of Chrysler Credit Corporation, to repossess a vehicle in the possession of Lucy Goodwin and subject to a valid security interest held by Chrysler. On October 7, 1982, Tom Elliott, an employee of Lightner Investigators, Inc., acting pursuant to Craig's instructions, went to Haleyville, Alabama, located and took possession of the vehicle, and then towed the automobile to a local Chrysler dealership.
Subsequently, Craig received a summons and complaint. The complaint sought damages for trespass to land and personal property and for conversion. Named as Defendants were Chrysler Credit, Mary Redmond, Lightner Investigators, and Tom Elliott. At the hearing on Appellants' motion to set aside the default judgment, Craig testified that Mary Redmond informed him that Chrysler's lawyer would "handle the whole matter." Later, Redmond assured Craig that Chrysler Credit's lawyer would call Craig and make arrangements for Craig and Tom Elliott to give a deposition at his office.
Craig testified that he thereafter received notice of the default judgment against Lightner Investigators and Tom Elliott, awarding damages in the amount of $125,000. He then called Mary Redmond for an explanation. Redmond notified Craig that the lawyer for Chrysler Credit could not represent Lightner Investigators or Tom Elliott because of a potential conflict of interest. Lightner and Elliott then retained separate counsel, and moved, within 30 days of entry of judgment, to set aside the entry of default, made pursuant to Rule 55, A.R.Civ.P. From an adverse ruling, they appeal following certification pursuant to A.R.Civ.P. 54(b).
The standard of review here applicable is whether the trial judge abused his discretion in refusing to set aside the default. In Oliver v. Sawyer, 359 So.2d 368 (Ala.1978), Justice Shores, writing for the majority, said:
In this case, Sandy Craig presented uncontroverted testimony that, as a result of several conversations with Mary Redmond of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Kirtland v. Fort Morgan Authority Sewer Service, Inc.
...the trial court's decision constituted an abuse of discretion. Johnson v. Moore, 514 So.2d 1343 (Ala.1987); Lightner Investigators, Inc. v. Goodwin, 447 So.2d 679 (Ala.1984); Roberts v. Wettlin, 431 So.2d 524 (Ala.1983). Thus, the question sub judice is whether the trial court abused its di......
-
Hilyer v. Fortier
...determining whether to deny a motion to set aside a default judgment. See, e.g. Sampson v. Cansler, supra ; Lightner Investigators, Inc. v. Goodwin, 447 So.2d 679 (Ala. 1984) ; see also Appalachian Stove & Fabricators, Inc. v. Roberts, 544 So.2d 893, 896 (Ala. 1989) ("If [the defendant] had......
-
Traywick v. Kidd
...Auth. Sewer Serv., Inc., 524 So.2d 600, 603 (Ala.1988) (citing Johnson v. Moore, 514 So.2d 1343 (Ala.1987); Lightner Investigators, Inc. v. Goodwin, 447 So.2d 679 (Ala.1984); and Roberts v. Wettlin, 431 So.2d 524 (Ala.1983)). Although, in determining whether to set aside an entry of default......
-
Agio Industries, Inc. v. Delta Oil Co., Inc.
...Delta. The most that can be said of Agio's failure to respond is that it was "reasonably excusable." See Lightner Investigators, Inc. v. Goodwin, 447 So.2d 679 (Ala.1984). It is not clear from the record exactly why the trial court dismissed Agio's cross-claim against Pesco. The order itsel......