Limerick Ecology Action, Inc. v. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Com'n, Nos. 85-3431

CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit
Writing for the CourtBefore BECKER, HUTCHINSON and SCIRICA; BECKER; SCIRICA
Citation869 F.2d 719
Parties19 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,907 LIMERICK ECOLOGY ACTION, INC., Petitioner in 85-3431, 86-3314, 87-3508, Thomas Martin, F8255, Petitioner in 85-3444, 87-3190, 87-3565, Robert L. Anthony, Petitioner in 85-3606, v. UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION and the United States of America, Respondents, Philadelphia Electric Company, Intervenor.
Decision Date25 April 1989
Docket Number85-3606,86-3314,87-3565,Nos. 85-3431,87-3508,87-3190,85-3444
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
44 practice notes
  • San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Auth. v. Jewell, Nos. 11–15871
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • March 13, 2014
    ...of Ala. ex rel. Siegelman v. EPA, 911 F.2d 499, 504 (11th Cir.1990); Limerick Ecology Action, Inc. v. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm'n, 869 F.2d 719, 729 n. 7 (3d Cir.1989); Izaak Walton League of Am. v. Marsh, 655 F.2d 346, 367 n. 51 (D.C.Cir.1981). We have been skeptical of the “functional ......
  • San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Auth. v. Jewell, No. 11-15871
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • March 13, 2014
    ...of Ala. ex rel. Siegleman v. EPA, 911 F.2d 499, 504 (11th Cir. 1990); Limerick Ecological Action, Inc. v. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm'n., 869 F.2d 719, 729 n.7 (3d Cir. 1989); Izaak Walton League of Am. v. Marsh, 655 F.2d 346, 367 n.51 (D.C. Cir. 1981). We have been skeptical of the "funct......
  • San Luis Obispo Peace v. Nuclear Regulatory, No. 03-74628.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • June 2, 2006
    ...a possible environmental consequence from analysis by labeling the risk as "unquantifiable." See Limerick Ecology Action, Inc. v. NRC, 869 F.2d 719, 754 (3rd Cir.1989) (J. Scirica, dissenting) (finding no "statutory provision, no NRC regulation or policy statement, and no case law that perm......
  • State of N.J., Dept. of Environmental Protection and Energy v. Long Island Power Authority, No. 93-5613
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit)
    • July 19, 1994
    ...inform the public that it has indeed considered environmental concerns in its decisionmaking process." Limerick Ecology Action v. NRC, 869 F.2d 719, 725 (3d Cir.1989) (quoting Baltimore Gas & Elec. Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 462 U.S. 87, 97, 103 S.Ct. 2246, 2252, 76 L.Ed.2d 4......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
40 cases
  • San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Auth. v. Jewell, Nos. 11–15871
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • March 13, 2014
    ...of Ala. ex rel. Siegelman v. EPA, 911 F.2d 499, 504 (11th Cir.1990); Limerick Ecology Action, Inc. v. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm'n, 869 F.2d 719, 729 n. 7 (3d Cir.1989); Izaak Walton League of Am. v. Marsh, 655 F.2d 346, 367 n. 51 (D.C.Cir.1981). We have been skeptical of the “functional ......
  • San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Auth. v. Jewell, No. 11-15871
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • March 13, 2014
    ...of Ala. ex rel. Siegleman v. EPA, 911 F.2d 499, 504 (11th Cir. 1990); Limerick Ecological Action, Inc. v. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm'n., 869 F.2d 719, 729 n.7 (3d Cir. 1989); Izaak Walton League of Am. v. Marsh, 655 F.2d 346, 367 n.51 (D.C. Cir. 1981). We have been skeptical of the "funct......
  • San Luis Obispo Peace v. Nuclear Regulatory, No. 03-74628.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • June 2, 2006
    ...a possible environmental consequence from analysis by labeling the risk as "unquantifiable." See Limerick Ecology Action, Inc. v. NRC, 869 F.2d 719, 754 (3rd Cir.1989) (J. Scirica, dissenting) (finding no "statutory provision, no NRC regulation or policy statement, and no case law that perm......
  • State of N.J., Dept. of Environmental Protection and Energy v. Long Island Power Authority, No. 93-5613
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit)
    • July 19, 1994
    ...inform the public that it has indeed considered environmental concerns in its decisionmaking process." Limerick Ecology Action v. NRC, 869 F.2d 719, 725 (3d Cir.1989) (quoting Baltimore Gas & Elec. Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 462 U.S. 87, 97, 103 S.Ct. 2246, 2252, 76 L.Ed.2d 4......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • NEPA's Trajectory: Our Waning Environmental Charter From Nixon to Trump?
    • United States
    • Environmental Law Reporter Nbr. 50-5, May 2020
    • May 1, 2020
    ...Environmental Prot. Agency, 943 F.2d 867, 22 ELR 20062 (8th Cir. 1991); Limerick Ecology Action, Inc. v. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm’n, 869 F.2d 719, 729 n.7, 19 ELR 20907 (3d Cir. 1989); Merrell v. homas, 807 F.2d 776, 17 ELR 20317 (9th Cir. 1986); Basel Action Network v. Maritime Admin.,......
  • Administering the National Environmental Policy Act
    • United States
    • Environmental Law Reporter Nbr. 45-4, April 2015
    • April 1, 2015
    ...once stated that the 1978 regulations “are not binding on an agency that has not expressly adopted them.” Limerick Ecology Action v. NRC, 869 F.2d 719, 725, 19 ELR 20907 (3d Cir. 1989). 370. 5 U.S.C. §706(2)(D). 371. See Native Ecosys. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 418 F.2d 953, 960-61, 964......
  • ADMINISTRATIVE BULKHEADS.
    • United States
    • Environmental Law Vol. 51 Nbr. 1, March 2021
    • March 22, 2021
    ...Id. at 738. (155) Id. at 750; id. at 751 (citing Baltimore Gas, 462 U.S. 87, 97 (1983)) (discussing deference afforded to agency). (156) 869 F.2d 719 (3d Cir. (157) Id. at 751 (citing Baltimore Gas, 462 U.S. at 97) (discussing deference afforded to agency). (158) Id. at 731-32, 741-42. (159......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT