Linam v. Jones
Decision Date | 23 April 1902 |
Citation | 33 So. 343,134 Ala. 570 |
Parties | LINAM v. JONES. [a1] |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Appeal from circuit court, Monroe county; Jno. C. Anderson, Judge.
Action by J. B. Jones against Mary E. Linam. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant appeals. Reversed.
This was an action commenced before a justice of the peace, the plaintiff suing out an attachment as landlord for the collection of rent alleged to be due. After judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff by the justice of the peace, the defendant appealed to the circuit court.
The complaint was in words and figures as follows: "The plaintiff claims of the defendant twelve hundred pounds of lint cotton, or its alternate value, one hundred and eight dollars, the rent of a tract of land, viz., one hundred and twenty acres of land, more or less, known as the 'J. B Jones Place,' in Monroe county, Alabama, which was demised by the plaintiff to the defendant in the year 1900 and for the year 1900."
To this complaint the defendant filed the following pleas: The defendant filed in the circuit court a plea in abatement seeking to have a writ of attachment quashed, on the ground of defects existing therein as averred in said plea.
The plaintiff filed the following replication: "Comes plaintiff, and for replication to pleas Nos. 3, 4, 5, and 6 of defendant, says and avers that he, as individual, and not as agent of any one, rented said land to H. L. Linam for the year 1900; that when said H. L. Linam died plaintiff went to see defendant, and defendant was allowed by plaintiff to remain upon the land upon her agreeing to pay said rent of twelve hundred pounds of lint cotton for rent of said land for 1900, and defendant agreed to pay said rent for said land, and plaintiff thereupon agreed for her to remain in possession of the land, to cultivate the crop; and that said land belongs to plaintiff, and she remained under her contract with plaintiff."
Issue was joined on the first and second pleas of the defendant, and on the plaintiff's replication to the third, fourth, fifth, and sixth pleas of the defendant, and upon this issue the cause was tried. On the trial of the cause the defendant moved the court to quash the writ of attachment, assigning as grounds thereof several alleged defects in said writ. The defendant moved the court to strike this motion to quash the writ of attachment as filed. The court sustained the plaintiff's motion to strike. To this ruling the plaintiff duly excepted. Plaintiff also moved the court to strike the plea in abatement. The court sustained this motion, and struck said plea, and to this ruling the defendant duly excepted.
On the trial of the cause, the plaintiff, as a witness in his own behalf, testified that he owned about 120 acres of land in Monroe county, and had been in possession of said lands since 1885; that he rented this land to H. L. Linam, the husband of the defendant, for the year 1900; that during the month of April, 1900, H. L. Linam died, and shortly after his death ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Dunning v. Town of Thomasville
...and Council of Columbiana v. J.W. Kelley et al., 172 Ala. 336, 55 So. 526; St. Clair Co. v. Smith, 112 Ala. 347, 20 So. 384; Linam v. Jones, 134 Ala. 570, 33 So. 343; Trott v. B.R.L. & P. Co., 144 Ala. 383, 39 So. Ritter v. Hoy, 1 Ala.App. 644, 55 So. 1034; Ex parte Lane, 12 Ala.App. (on re......
-
Baker v. Clark
... ... mentioned. Authorities supra; Code, § 4143, and citations in ... Code under that section. Linam v. Jones, 134 Ala ... 579, 33 So. 343; Ritter v. Hoy, 1 Ala.App. 643, 55 ... So. 1034 ... Innocent ... misrepresentations furnish ... ...
-
Birmingham Elec. Co. v. Echols
... ... grounds of the demurrers interposed thereto. Louisville & ... N. R. Co. v. Williams, 113 Ala. 402, 21 So. 938; Linam v ... Jones, 134 Ala. 570, 33 So. 343; Chandler v ... Price, 244 Ala. 667, 15 So.2d 462; Griffin v ... Fowler, 17 Ala.App. 163, 82 So. 653; ... ...
-
Commissioners' Court of Chilton County v. State
... ... below, and cannot be looked to or considered by us for the ... purpose of determining whether properly or improperly ... granted. Jones v. Anniston, 138 Ala. 199, 35 South, ... 112, and cases there cited. Speaking to this point, it was ... said in Randall v. Wadsworth, 130 Ala. 638, ... In other words, such a complaint will not ... support a judgment. Trott v. Birmingham Ry. Light & P ... Co. (Ala.) 39 So. 716; Linam v. Jones, 134 Ala ... 570, 579, 33 So. 343, and cases there collected. It is ... entirely clear that the relator's right to the writ ... sought ... ...