Lincoln Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. Hammer
Decision Date | 19 April 1930 |
Docket Number | No. 8623.,8623. |
Citation | 41 F.2d 12 |
Parties | LINCOLN NAT. LIFE INS. CO. OF FORT WAYNE, IND., v. HAMMER et al. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
Herbert G. Nilles, of Fargo, N. D., and F. B. Shoaff, of Fort Wayne, Ind. (R. F. Baird and Clyde J. Cover, both of Fort Wayne, Ind., and M. W. Murphy and Aubrey Lawrence, both of Fargo, N. D., on the brief), for appellant.
Francis Murphy, of Fargo, N. D. (W. H. Shure, of Fargo, N. D., on the brief), for appellees.
Before STONE and VAN VALKENBURGH, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, District Judge.
As Modified.
Halvor S. Halvorson, a resident and citizen of the state of North Dakota, died intestate on the 24th day of December 1926. Appellee Hammer is administrator of his estate; the remaining appellees are his widow and children. November 24, 1922, appellant, a life insurance company of Fort Wayne, Ind., and a citizen and resident of that state, issued to the deceased a five-year term policy of life insurance by which, in consideration of an annual premium of $213, it agreed to pay, subject to certain conditions and stipulations, and upon proof of death of the insured, the sum of $15,000 to his estate. Among other things, this policy provided that, if the annual premium accruing should not be paid when due, nor within thirty-one days thereafter, said policy should lapse, become null and void, and of no legal effect. The policy also contained the following reinstatement clause:
"Should this policy lapse it may be reinstated at any time upon the insured furnishing evidence of insurability satisfactory to the Company and paying all premium arrears with interest at six per cent per annum compounded annually."
The premium on said policy of $213 which fell due on November 24, 1925, was not paid; and on or about November 25, 1925, the insured applied to and requested of appellant an extension of time for the payment of said premium; at the same time he executed a certain agreement, in writing, subject to approval by appellant, which was submitted to appellant at Fort Wayne, Ind., and was there accepted by it. This agreement was in the following terms:
This so-called "blue" note was not paid on or before the period of extension, nor within fifteen days thereafter. Appellant at once forwarded to the insured notice that his policy had lapsed, and offered him opportunity for reinstatement as follows:
Halvorson immediately executed the form inclosed to him, and forwarded it to appellant at Fort Wayne, Ind. It reads thus:
...............................
"I further represent that I am now in good health and of temperate habits and that since the date of issuance of this Policy I have had no injury, ailments, nor illness, neither have I consulted a physician for any cause except as noted below:
..............................
As stated, the insured died in the following December. The physician who attended the deceased in his last illness certified that the cause of death was "Uraemic Coma-Nephritis." In answer to the question, "When did health first become impaired?" the physician answered: "1 yr. ago following after pneumonia then got the Flue & this Nephritis followed." This certificate was executed January 14, 1927. The record contains the testimony of two physicians, who attended deceased in October and November, 1925, that he was then suffering from pneumonia, following influenza; that there were expectorations of blood, severe cough, rales in the lungs, shortness...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Overcash v. Yellow Transit Co.
... ... 906, 126 Okla. 3; Sturmer v. Travelers ... Ins. Co., 279 Ill.App. 607; Colvin v ... Tomlinson, 293 ... 51, 48 ... S.W.2d 35; Adams v. Continental Life, 340 Mo. 417, ... 101 S.W.2d 75; Simms v. Truscon Steel ... Co., ... 191 S.W. 418; Wastun v. Lincoln Natl. Life Ins. Co., ... 12 F.2d 422; Hugue-Kellogg Co ... F.2d 384; Lincoln Natl. Life Ins. Co. v. Hammer, 41 ... F.2d 12; Consolidated Flour Mills v. File, 110 ... ...
-
Occidental Life Ins. Co. of California v. Kielhorn
...1 Cir., 80 F.2d 136; New York Life Ins. Co. v. Seymour, 6 Cir., 45 F.2d 47, 73 A.L.R. 1523; Lincoln Nat. Life Ins. Co. of Fort Wayne, Ind. v. Hammer, 8 Cir., 41 F.2d 12. However, the situation which justified an equity action by the insurer for cancellation of the policies in the above-cite......
-
Winer v. New York Life Ins. Co.
... ... the opposing party.' Bank of Kentucky v. Stone ... (C.C.) 88 F. 383, 391; Cf. Lincoln Nat. L. Ins. Co ... v. Hammer (C.C.A. [8th]) 41 F.2d 12, 16. To make a ... contract ... ...
-
Rosenthal v. New York Life Ins. Co.
...in the procurement of the reinstatement, is sustained by the great weight of authority, both federal and state. Lincoln Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. Hammer, 8 Cir., 41 F.2d 12, 17; State Life Insurance Co. v. Spencer, 5 Cir., 62 F.2d 640; New York Life Insurance Co. v. Seymour, 6 Cir., 45 F.2d 47,......