Lindley v. Smith
Decision Date | 31 January 1871 |
Citation | 1871 WL 7914,58 Ill. 250 |
Parties | SAMUEL LINDLEYv.SILAS SMITH et al. |
Court | Illinois Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
WRIT OF ERROR to the Circuit Court of Clark county; the Hon. HIRAM B. DECIUS, Judge, presiding.
Mr. R. L. DULANEY, and Mr. R. W. THOMPSON, for the plaintiff in error.
Mr. JOHN SCHOLFIELD, for the defendants in error.
This was a bill in chancery, to correct a mistake in the certificate of acknowledgment of a married woman, of a deed conveying land to which she held the legal title.
The defect in the certificate of acknowledgment by the justice of the peace, appears to be that he did not state therein that the wife was personally known to him as the real person whose name was signed to the deed as having executed the same.
The statute on this subject is as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Frank v. Hicks
...B. Mon., 268; Building Asso. v. Clark, supra.) A court of equity cannot put vitality into an instrument having none in itself. (Lindley v. Smith, 58 Ill. 250; Murphy Williamson, 85 Ill. 150; Tulley v. Davis, 30 Ill. 103; Adams v. Bishop, 19 Ill. 395; Montag v. Linn, 19 Ill. 399; Emeric v. A......
-
Gray v. Law
... ... effect are the following cases: Shelton v. Aultman & ... Taylor Co., 82 Ala. 315, 8 So. 232; Carr v ... Hanley, 22 Fla. 317; Lendly v. Smith, 58 Ill ... 250; Fisher v. Meccter, 24 Mich. 447; Smith v ... Ward, 2 Root. (Conn.) 378; Chamberlain v ... Spangler, 86 N.Y. 603; Dolph v ... ...
-
Mettler v. Miller
...were made known and explained to her. In respect to her and her heirs, the deed was absolutely void. Kerr v. Russell, 69 Ill. 666;Lindley v. Smith, 58 Ill. 250; and numerous other cases. 4. It was not error to admit in testimony the various instruments of evidence offered by appellant for t......
-
Washburn v. Roesch
...must be acknowledged in the proper form prescribed by the statute, otherwise the deed is useless as a conveyance of title: Lindley v. Smith, 58 Ill. 250; Kerr v. Russell, 69 Ill. 666; Bressler v. Kent, 61 Ill. 426. As to how corporate existence can be acquired: Bigelow v. Gregory, 73 Ill. 1......