Lindsay v. Kelley

Citation89 S.Ct. 2130,395 U.S. 827,23 L.Ed.2d 738
Decision Date23 June 1969
Docket NumberNo. 1370,1370
PartiesAlexander H. LINDSAY v. Joseph J. KELLEY, Jr., Secretary of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
CourtUnited States Supreme Court

James E. Beasley, for appellant.

William C. Sennett, Atty. Gen. of Pennsylvania, and Edward Friedman, for appellee.

Bernard G. Segal, Samuel D. Slade and Ralph S. Snyder, for the Pennsylvania Bar Ass'n, as amicus curiae.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of the Pennsylvania Bar Association for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
25 cases
  • Jones, In re
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • May 9, 1984
    ...Tucker, supra; Stander v. Kelley, 433 Pa. 406, 250 A.2d 474 (1969), cert. denied and appeal dismissed sub nom. Lindsay v. Kelly, 395 U.S. 827, 89 S.Ct. 2130, 23 L.Ed.2d 738 (1969). The consideration of the qualifications as set forth by the constitutional mandate is merely tangential to the......
  • NEWTON v. U.S.
    • United States
    • D.C. Court of Appeals
    • July 7, 1992
    ... ... United States, 357 A.2d 421, 423 (D.C. 1976). 6 ...         In Lindsay v. United States, 520 A.2d 1059 (D.C. 1987), we affirmed the trial court's action reinstating a conviction and reimposing sentence after both had ... ...
  • Donovan v. Delgado
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Puerto Rico
    • October 15, 1971
  • Ripon Soc., Inc. v. National Republican Party
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • February 23, 1976
    ...294 So.2d 532, 534 (La.1974); Stander v. Kelley, 433 Pa. 406, 250 A.2d 474, 481, cert. denied sub nom. Lindsay v. Kelley, 395 U.S. 827, 89 S.Ct. 2130, 23 L.Ed.2d 738 (1969); Livingston v. Ogilvie, 43 Ill.2d 9, 250 N.E.2d 138, 145--46 We know also that the one person, one vote requirement, t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT