Lindsay v. State
Decision Date | 08 March 2019 |
Docket Number | CR-15-1061 |
Citation | 326 So.3d 1 |
Parties | Stephon LINDSAY v. STATE of Alabama |
Court | Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals |
Angela L. Setzer and Alison N. Mollman of Equal Justice Initiative, Montgomery; Paul R. Roberts II, Gadsden; and Scott F. Stewart, Gadsden, for appellant.
Steve Marshall, atty. gen., and Stephen M. Frisby (withdrew 01/11/2019) and Chrstopher R. Reader (on remand), asst. attys. gen., for appellee.
The appellant, Stephon Lindsay, was convicted of murdering his 21-month-old daughter, Maliyah Lindsay, an offense defined as capital by § 13A-5-40(a)(15), Ala. Code 1975, because Maliyah was less than 14 years of age. The jury unanimously recommended that Lindsay be sentenced to death. The circuit court followed the jury's recommendation and sentenced Lindsay to death.1 This appeal, which is automatic in a case involving the death penalty, followed. See § 13A-5-55, Ala. Code 1975.
The State's evidence tended to show that on March 12, 2013, police discovered Maliyah's body in a wooded area after Lindsay confessed to murdering her and told police where he had taken her body. Dr. Valerie Green, medical examiner with the Alabama Department of Forensic Sciences, testified that Maliyah died of "multiple sharp force injuries" to her neck and that the cuts severed her jugular vein and carotid artery. (R. 1811.) The cuts were so deep, Dr. Green said, that Maliyah's spinal cord was visible. Maliyah also had cuts on her chest and chin, defensive wounds on her hands, and bruising around her mouth, which was consistent with someone holding his hand over Maliyah's mouth. (R. 1786.)
Tasmine Thomas, Maliyah's mother, testified that she and Lindsay had two children together and that Maliyah was born in June 2011. She testified that at the time Maliyah was murdered she and Lindsay and the children lived in a two-story apartment on White Avenue in Gadsden. On March 5, 2013, she said, she stayed in the apartment all day and went to the grocery store that evening. When she got back from the store she started feeling sick and went to bed. Lindsay told her that his sister was going to take Maliyah to go stay with her so that Thomas could have a break. Thomas testified:
(R. 1569-70.) Thomas said that on March 11, 2013, she asked Lindsay when he was going to bring Maliyah home. She said that Lindsay left their apartment early that morning and told her that he was going to get Maliyah. She waited for Lindsay about three hours and then telephoned Lindsay's sister. His sister told her that Maliyah had not been with them and that she had not seen Maliyah since March 5. Thomas then telephoned emergency 911.
Det. Thomas Hammonds with the City of Gadsden Police Department testified that he was assigned to investigate the case and that police tried to locate Lindsay and tracked his cellular telephone to an address in Clayton. When Lindsay came out of the door of the residence he asked Lindsay if Maliyah was okay and Lindsay responded, "No, she's not okay" ... "She is not alive." (R. 1600.) He took Lindsay back to the police station and advised him of his Miranda 2 rights. Lindsay confessed that he killed Maliyah by cutting her neck, and he told police that he put her body in a bag and took the body to a wooded area. He also said that he took several weapons, an axe and several swords, and disposed of them near the body.
In the circuit court's sentencing order, the court set out the following facts surrounding Lindsay's confession:
(C. 115-16.)
In his defense, Lindsay presented the testimony of Dr. Robert Bare, a psychologist at Taylor Hardin Secure Medical Facility ("Taylor Hardin"). Dr. Bare testified that he evaluated Lindsay and that it was his opinion that Lindsay suffered from paranoid schizophrenia with a personality disorder.
"[Dr. Bare]: [W]hen [Lindsay] initially came to [Taylor Hardin] he had -– Mr. Lindsay had exhibited delusions of grandiose delusions that he was the son of Yahweh, that he had been -– that some of the acts that we will talk about in a minute were prompted by his belief in Yahweh and essentially commanded to him by Yahweh."
(R. 1856.) Lindsay was placed on medication and improved, Dr. Bare said.
On cross-examination, Dr. Bare stated that he spoke with many of Lindsay's family members.
(R. 1901-02.) Dr. Bare also testified that he had not seen Lindsay experience any hallucinations but relied on what the staff at Taylor Hardin and Lindsay had told him. He further stated that before Lindsay was brought to Taylor Hardin and while he was incarcerated at the county jail he exhibited no "overt sign of any kind of psychotic behavior." (R. 1903.) He could not say if the hallucinations were caused by Lindsay's mental-health issues or by Lindsay's substance abuse.
The jury found Lindsay guilty of murdering Maliyah. A presentence report was prepared and a sentencing hearing was held before the same jury. The jury unanimously recommended a sentence of death after it found two aggravating circumstances: (1) that Lindsay had previously been convicted of a felony involving the use or threat of violence to the person, § 13A-5-49(2), Ala. Code 1975; and (2) that the murder was especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel as compared to other capital murders, § 13A-5-49(8), Ala. Code 1975.3 The circuit court issued an order sentencing Lindsay to death. This appeal followed.
Because Lindsay has been sentenced to death, this Court must search the record of the trial proceedings for "plain error." See Rule 45A, Ala. R. App. P. Rule 45A, states:
"In all cases in which the death penalty has been imposed, the Court of Criminal Appeals shall notice any plain error or defect in the proceedings under review, whether or not brought to the attention of the trial court, and take appropriate appellate action by reason thereof, whenever such error...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Dearman v. State
...to set a competency hearing and that hearing must be held not more than 42 days after the judge receives the report." Lindsay v. State, 326 So.3d 1, 17-18 (Ala.Crim.App.2019), quoting Tankersley v. State, 724 So.2d 557, 565 (Ala.Crim.App.1998). "'"The trial court is in a far better position......
-
Belcher v. State
...698 So. 2d 162, 167–68 (Ala. 1997). "Alabama appellate courts have rarely found plain error in the Batson context." Lindsay v. State, 326 So.3d 1, 24 (Ala. Crim. App. 2019).8 The venire consisted of 59 prospective jurors. After several prospective jurors were excused for medical and hardshi......
-
State v. Mitchell
...after Hurst. See, e.g., Hicks v. State, [Ms. CR-15-0747, July 12, 2019] So. 3d___, ___ (Ala.Crim.App.2019); Lindsay v. State, 326 So.3d 1, 55 (Ala.Crim.App.2019); Knight v. State, 300 So.3d 76, 128-30 (Ala.Crim.App.2018). Mitchell's as-applied claim also lacks merit. The trial court found f......
-
State v. Mitchell
... ... repeatedly held that Alabama's capital-sentencing scheme, ... including judicial override, remained constitutional after ... Hurst ... See, e.g. , Hicks v. State , ... [Ms. CR-15-0747, July 12, 2019] So. 3d___, ___ ... (Ala.Crim.App.2019); Lindsay v. State , 326 So.3d 1, ... 55 (Ala.Crim.App.2019); Knight v. State , 300 So.3d ... 76, 128-30 (Ala.Crim.App.2018) ... Mitchell's ... as-applied claim also lacks merit. The trial court found five ... aggravating circumstances: (1) Mitchell committed the ... ...