Lindsay v. U.S. Savings & Loan Co.
Citation | 24 So. 171,120 Ala. 156 |
Parties | LINDSAY v. UNITED STATES SAVINGS & LOAN CO. ET AL. |
Decision Date | 08 November 1898 |
Court | Supreme Court of Alabama |
Appeal from chancery court, Jefferson county; Thomas Cobbs Chancellor.
Action by Henrietta A. Lindsay against the United States Savings & Loan Company and others for an accounting as to the amount due on a note and mortgage, to redeem real estate covered by the mortgage, and to enjoin the foreclosure of such mortgage. A register was appointed to take and state an account. From an order overruling exceptions to the report, and rendering judgment thereon, the complainant appeals. Reversed.
The appellant, Henrietta A. Lindsay, opened negotiations with the United States Savings, Loan & Building Company, a building and loan corporation of St. Paul, Minn., for the purpose of securing a loan from said company; and on May 17, 1890, the negotiations were completed, and Henrietta A. Lindsay subscribed for 50 shares of stock in said company, and executed to it the following note: To secure this note, Mrs. Lindsay, together with her husband gave a mortgage upon certain real estate. This mortgage contained the following stipulations: After the execution of the note, Mrs. Lindsay, up to and including March, 1893, continued to pay to said corporation the monthly installment of $42.50, as stipulated for in the note and mortgage, $12.50 of such amount being called the interest on said loan. After March, 1893, Mrs. Lindsay ceased to pay any monthly installments, whereupon the United States Savings, Loan & Building Company declared Mrs. Lindsay in default, and, acting through and by its attorney, advertised the mortgaged premises for sale on September 16, 1893. Subsequent to the execution of the note and mortgage, the name of the corporation to which they were given was changed to that of the United States Savings & Loan Company.
The bill in this case was filed by Mrs. Lindsay against the United States Savings & Loan Company and their attorneys and, after averring the facts pertaining to the negotiation of the loan, averred that the complainant was paying a usurious rate of interest for the money loaned to her. The prayer of the bill was for an accounting between the complainant and the defendant corporation, for the purpose of ascertaining the money justly due from her, after allowing the legal rate of interest, to redeem the real estate she had mortgaged, by the payment of the amount ascertained to be due thereon; and, further, that the United States Savings & Loan Company and its attorneys be enjoined from foreclosing said mortgage. On the final submission of the cause, on the pleadings and proof, the chancellor rendered the following decree: The register made his report, and the complainant filed her exceptions thereto, as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re Fite
... ... judicially know, that at the time the judgment which is ... before us for consideration was rendered, there were ... twenty-three separate ... required by section 45 of the Constitution. Lindsay v ... United States Savings & Loan Association, 120 Ala. 156, ... 24 ... ...
-
Keller v. State
...See, also, Mayor v. Horn, 26 Md. 194; Butler v. Saginaw County, 26 Mich. 22; 8 Enc. of Law & Proc. pp. 725, 810; Lindsay v. U. S. Savings Ass'n, 120 Ala. 156, 24 South. 171, 42 L. R. A. 783; State v. McGrath, 95 Mo. 193, 8 S. W. 425; Wanser v. Hoss, 80 N. J. Law, 482; State v. Spers (Tenn. ......
-
Katz v. Herrick
...applies to the construction of statutes themselves and not to the matter of their titles. Another comment which might be made on the Lindsay case is that Alabama constitution requires the subject of the act to be "clearly" expressed in the title. This word does not appear in the Idaho const......
-
Yeilding v. State ex rel. Wilkinson
... ... before us, was to secure greater economy and a better and ... more efficient ... Lindsay v. United States Savings & Loan Association et ... al., 120 Ala. 156, 24 ... ...