Lindsey, In re, Nos. 98-3060
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia) |
| Writing for the Court | PER CURIAM; TATEL |
| Citation | 158 F.3d 1263 |
| Parties | In re Bruce R. LINDSEY (Grand Jury Testimony). |
| Docket Number | Nos. 98-3060,98-3062 and 98-3072 |
| Decision Date | 09 October 1998 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
105 practice notes
-
Karnoski v. Trump, No. 18-35347
...The term "executive privilege" is sometimes used to refer to the presidential communications privilege, see, e.g., In re Lindsey , 158 F.3d 1263, 1266–67 (D.C. Cir. 1998), and is sometimes "used to refer to a wide variety of evidentiary and substantive privileges that courts accord the exec......
-
In re Lott, No. 05-3532.
...considerations counsel otherwise. See In re Witness Before Special Grand Jury 2000-2, 288 F.3d 289, 292-94 (7th Cir.2002); In re Lindsey, 158 F.3d 1263, 1275-78 (D.C.Cir.1998); In re Grand Jury Subpoena Page 462 Tecum, 112 F.3d 910, 920-21 (8th Cir.1997) (all rejecting a governmental attorn......
-
Rojas v. F.A.A., No. 17-55036
...and despite the long-established rule that the government is entitled to the same litigation privileges as other parties. In re Lindsey, 158 F.3d 1263, 1269 (D.C. Cir. 1998) ("Congress intended that agencies should not lose the protection traditionally afforded through the evidentiary privi......
-
Paxton v. City of Dall., No. 15–0073
...a broad array of materials in many areas of the executive branch will become ‘sequester[ed]’ from public view." In re Bruce Lindsey , 158 F.3d 1263, 1274 (D.C. Cir. 1998) (quoting In re Sealed Case , 121 F.3d 729, 749 (D.C. Cir. 1997) ). Carefully balancing these inherently conflicting inte......
Request a trial to view additional results
105 cases
-
Karnoski v. Trump, No. 18-35347
...The term "executive privilege" is sometimes used to refer to the presidential communications privilege, see, e.g., In re Lindsey , 158 F.3d 1263, 1266–67 (D.C. Cir. 1998), and is sometimes "used to refer to a wide variety of evidentiary and substantive privileges that courts accord the exec......
-
In re Lott, No. 05-3532.
...considerations counsel otherwise. See In re Witness Before Special Grand Jury 2000-2, 288 F.3d 289, 292-94 (7th Cir.2002); In re Lindsey, 158 F.3d 1263, 1275-78 (D.C.Cir.1998); In re Grand Jury Subpoena Page 462 Tecum, 112 F.3d 910, 920-21 (8th Cir.1997) (all rejecting a governmental attorn......
-
Rojas v. F.A.A., No. 17-55036
...and despite the long-established rule that the government is entitled to the same litigation privileges as other parties. In re Lindsey, 158 F.3d 1263, 1269 (D.C. Cir. 1998) ("Congress intended that agencies should not lose the protection traditionally afforded through the evidentiary privi......
-
Paxton v. City of Dall., No. 15–0073
...a broad array of materials in many areas of the executive branch will become ‘sequester[ed]’ from public view." In re Bruce Lindsey , 158 F.3d 1263, 1274 (D.C. Cir. 1998) (quoting In re Sealed Case , 121 F.3d 729, 749 (D.C. Cir. 1997) ). Carefully balancing these inherently conflicting inte......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
HOUSE RULES: CONGRESS AND THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE.
...viewed as the law of the land when such evidence is sought by a federal grand jury or in any related criminal proceeding."). (288.) 158 F.3d 1263 (D.C. Cir. 1998) (per (289.) Id. at 1268. (290.) Id. at 1266 (finding that, "[i]n the context of federal criminal investigations and tr......