Lint v. Kitzhaber
Decision Date | 09 July 2003 |
Parties | LINCOLN INTERAGENCY NARCOTICS TEAM (LINT), a law enforcement agency created by intergovernmental agreement, Appellant, and Lincoln County, a political subdivision of the State of Oregon, Plaintiff, and Animal Legal Defense Fund, Oregon Humane Society, Humane Society of the Willamette Valley, Stephan K. Otto, Sharon M. Harmon, and Wayne S. Geiger, Intervenors-Appellants, v. John D. KITZHABER, M.D., Governor of the State of Oregon, Bill Bradbury, Oregon Secretary of State, and the State of Oregon, Respondents, and Ray Heslep and Sandra Adamson, Intervenors-Respondents. |
Court | Oregon Court of Appeals |
Rob Bovett argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant Lincoln Interagency Narcotics Team.
B. Carlton Grew, Salem, argued the cause and filed the briefs for intervenors-appellants Animal Legal Defense Fund, Oregon Humane Society, Humane Society of the Willamette Valley, Stephan K. Otto, Sharon M. Harmon, and Wayne S. Geiger.
Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, argued the cause for respondents John D. Kitzhaber, M.D., Bill Bradbury, and State of Oregon. With her on the brief was Hardy Myers, Attorney General.
Eli D. Stutsman, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for intervenors-respondents Ray Heslep and Sandra Adamson.
Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG and BREWER, Judges.
Plaintiffs brought this action under the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act, ORS 28.010—28.160, challenging the constitutionality of Ballot Measure 3 (2000) (Measure 3 or Oregon Property Protection Act).1 Measure 3 added section 10 to Article XV of the Oregon Constitution. Section 10 consists of 12 subsections. Plaintiffs argued that Measure 3 contains two or more constitutional amendments that should have been voted on separately under Article XVII, section 1, of the Oregon Constitution.2 Plaintiffs also argued that Measure 3 addresses more than one subject, in violation of Article IV, section 1(2)(d), of the Oregon Constitution.3
The circuit court entered judgment for defendants and upheld the constitutionality of Measure 3 against both challenges. For the reasons that follow, we reverse the judgment of the circuit court.
Plaintiff Lincoln County is a political subdivision of the State of Oregon, and plaintiff Lincoln Interagency Narcotics Team is a law enforcement agency created by intergovernmental agreement under ORS chapter 190. Both plaintiffs are subject to rights and responsibilities under Measure 3. Plaintiff intervenors are three individuals and three private organizations that are involved in various ways with animal protection issues.4 Defendants are the former Governor and the Secretary of State of Oregon. Defendant intervenors are the chief petitioners for Measure 3. Because this action presented only legal issues concerning the constitutionality of Measure 3, the parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. After the trial court entered summary judgment for defendants, plaintiffs appealed to this court.
We begin by describing the history and substance of Measure 3. The voters adopted the measure on November 7, 2000. Measure 3 provides:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Californians for an Open Primary v. McPherson, S126780.
... ... In addressing that question, the Court of Appeal followed a minority rule that recently was reinvigorated by Armatta v. Kitzhaber (1998) 327 Or. 250, 959 P.2d 49 ( Armatta ) — a decision in which the Oregon Supreme Court construed its state's separate-vote provision as ... State (2002) 334 Or. 645, 56 P.3d 892, 904-911 ( League of Oregon Cities ); LINT v. Kitzhaber (2003) 188 Or.App. 526, 72 P.3d 967, 971-983, rev. allowed, 84 P.3d 1080; Clean Elections Institute, Inc. v. Brewer (2004) 209 Ariz ... ...
-
Meyer v. Bradbury
... ... As such, it constitutes an appropriate pre-election challenge. Cf. Armatta v. Kitzhaber, 327 Or. 250, 259, 959 P.2d 49 (1998) (noting that "submission of such [initiative and referendum] measures shall be guided both by Article IV, ... Kitzhaber, 188 Or.App. 526, 72 P.3d 967 (2003), rev. allowed, 336 Or. 376, 84 P.3d 1080 (2004) (LINT), this court reviewed all of the Supreme Court cases applying the "closely related" analysis. A ... ...
-
Lincoln Interagency Narcotics v. Kitzhaber, CC 00C-19878.
... 145 P.3d 151 ... 341 Or. 496 ... LINCOLN INTERAGENCY NARCOTICS TEAM (LINT), a law enforcement agency created by intergovernmental agreement, Respondent on Review, and ... Lincoln County, a political subdivision of the State of Oregon, Plaintiff, and ... Animal Legal Defense Fund, Oregon Humane Society, Humane Society of the Willamette Valley, Stephan K. Otto, Sharon M ... ...
-
Scott v. Jackson County, Civ. 03-3068-AA.
... ... Notably, the OPPA was ruled unconstitutional by the Oregon Court of Appeals in 2003. See Lincoln Interagency Narcotics Team (LINT) v. Kitzhaber, 188 Or.App. 526, 553-54, 72 P.3d 967 (2003). Although the Oregon Supreme Court granted review ... Page 1011 ... of this decision ... ...