Lipman v. Industrial Commission
| Decision Date | 12 March 1979 |
| Docket Number | No. 15821,15821 |
| Citation | 592 P.2d 616 |
| Parties | L. Virginia LIPMAN, widow of Paul Lipman, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION of Utah, Utah State Prison, and State Insurance Fund, Defendants. |
| Court | Utah Supreme Court |
Scott W. Cameron, of Backman, Clark & Marsh, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff.
Robert B. Hansen, Atty. Gen., Robert D. Moore, Salt Lake City, for defendant.
Paul Lipman, husband of petitioner, died May 23, 1977, as a result of an acute myocardial infarction while on duty as the control room sergeant at the Utah State Prison. The Industrial Commission denied benefits to the petitioner because it found that her husband did not die as a result of an accident arising out of or in the course of his employment. 1 This matter was then brought before this Court for review. 2
The evidence before the Commission showed that the deceased had suffered one (and possibly two) heart attacks prior to his death. He suffered from an arteriosclerotic heart condition and had undergone corrective surgery the previous autumn for a perforal heart condition. In November 1976 he suffered an almost fatal episode of pulmonary edema while on vacation. As a result of his condition he was permitted to work only part time until approximately two months before his death. He was diabetic and had been a lifelong smoker of tobacco. His treating physician testified that a person with the medical and social history of the deceased had a high probability of being subject to a myocardial infarction and that this probability was not conditioned upon any unusual stress or exertion.
The petitioner claims that decedent's death was caused by the extra work and stress brought on by the "escape" of a female inmate. The woman was housed at the Y.W.C.A. in Salt Lake City which functioned as a half-way house for the prison where low-risk inmates were given certain community privileges as a step toward ultimate release. The woman was discovered to be missing at 11:55 p. m. on May 22, 1977, which has reported to one Connie Buck, a supervisory counselor at the facility, some 25 minutes later. Ms. Buck contacted Mr. Lipman at the prison and the Y.W.C.A. director, whereupon the inmate was designated an escapee. Mr. Lipman was responsible for coordinating all information regarding the escape. He learned of the escape at about 12:40 a. m. on May 23, 1977, 3 and until his death, some two hours later, he had more phone calls than he otherwise would have handled.
We do not reach the ultimate issue as to whether or not the death was job related because the resolution of two procedural points raised by petitioner are dispositive of this review. The two points are: (1) that the Commission refused to refer this matter to a medical panel as provided by law, and (2) that the Commission applied an improper standard as to the burden of persuasion.
When liability is denied, an applicant for Workmen's Compensation is afforded a clear right to have the case referred to a medical penal appointed by the Commission. The applicable statute reads in pertinent part as follows:
Upon the filing of a claim for compensation for injury by accident, or for death, arising out of or in the course of employment, and where the employer or insurance carrier denies liability, the commission shall refer the medical aspects of the case to a medical panel appointed by the commission . . . . The medical panel shall make such study, take such X-rays and perform such tests, including post mortem examinations where authorized by the commission, as it may determine and thereafter shall make a report in writing to the commission . . . . 4
The foregoing statute is clearly mandatory and requires that a medical panel "shall" be convened "upon the filing of a claim for compensation for injury by accident, or for death, arising out of or in the course of employment," when the employer or insurance carrier denies liability.
In difficult or doubtful cases, the findings of a medical panel may assist in determining whether the death was caused by accident. In this case, it is known that death was caused by a myocardial infarction, but the ultimate question is whether or not it can be said that the myocardial infarction was causally related to circumstances occurring on the job. 5
Findings of a medical panel may well be important in assisting the Commission to determine whether job-caused stress induced injury or death in such...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Allen v. Industrial Com'n
... 729 P.2d 15 ... Robert A. ALLEN, Plaintiff, ... INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, Board of Review, Jer Ken, Inc., State ... Insurance Fund and Second Injury Fund, Defendants ... No. 20026 ... Supreme Court of Utah ... v. Industrial Commission, 104 Utah 61, 74, 138 P.2d 233, 238 (1943). The clear and convincing evidence standard was rejected, however, in Lipman v. Industrial Commission, 592 P.2d 616, 618 (Utah 1979), with the rationale that such a standard would make workers' compensation benefits nearly ... ...
-
Walls v. Industrial Com'n of Utah
... Page 964 ... 857 P.2d 964 ... Jacqui C. WALLS, Petitioner, ... The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF UTAH; Uninsured Employers' ... Fund; and Uncle Barts, Respondents ... No. 920499-CA ... Court of Appeals of Utah ... July 29, 1993 ... Agency, Inc., 606 P.2d 256, 258 (Utah 1980). Moreover, Walls must prove both of these requirements by a preponderance of the evidence. Lipman v. Industrial Comm'n, 592 P.2d 616, 618 (Utah 1979). Under the facts of this case, we hold that Walls failed to establish that her injury occurred ... ...
-
Buczynski v. Industrial Com'n of Utah, 940544-CA
... Page 1169 ... 934 P.2d 1169 ... 312 Utah Adv. Rep. 42 ... Patricia BUCZYNSKI, Petitioner, ... INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF UTAH, Workers' Compensation Fund of ... Utah, and Utah State University, Respondents ... No. 940544-CA ... Court of Appeals of Utah ... Walls v. Industrial Comm'n, 857 P.2d 964, 967 (Utah.Ct.App.1993). Both elements must be proven by a preponderance of the evidence. See Lipman v. Industrial Comm'n, 592 P.2d 616, 618 (Utah 1979). In the instant case, it is undisputed that petitioner sustained an injury by accident. Thus, ... ...
-
Hansen v. Hansen
...is universally recognized that the standard of proof in civil actions is by a preponderance of the evidence."); Lipman v. Industrial Comm'n, 592 P.2d 616, 618 (Utah 1979) (noting preponderance is "usual standard of proof ... used in most civil actions"); Morris v. Farmers Home Mut. Ins. Co.......