Liquefied Petroleum Gas Bd. v. Newton, 5-1803

Decision Date23 March 1959
Docket NumberNo. 5-1803,5-1803
CitationLiquefied Petroleum Gas Bd. v. Newton, 322 S.W.2d 67, 230 Ark. 267 (Ark. 1959)
PartiesLIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS BOARD et al., Appellants, v. Pete NEWTON, dba Hampton Butane Company, Appellee.
CourtArkansas Supreme Court

James L. Sloan, Little Rock, for appellants.

No brief filed for appellee.

HOLT, Justice.

Pete Newton, doing business as Hampton Butane Company, sued the Liquefied Petroleum Gas Control Board of Arkansas and M. L. Blair, its director, in the Calhoun County Chancery Court, alleging, in effect, that he had been engaged in the butane gas business for about 11 years in Hampton, Calhoun County, Arkansas, with a permit from the Gas Board; that the Board was attempting to cancel his permit in a manner not warranted by law and prayed for a temporary injunction and that upon a final hearing, that the temporary injunction be made permanent. On the same day that suit was filed, a temporary injunction was issued and on September 29, thereafter, the temporary injunction was served on each member of the Gas Board and its director, Blair, in Pulaski County, Arkansas. On October 3, 1958, the Gas Board moved to quash the service of the summonses and the temporary injunction on the ground that the Calhoun County Chancery Court was without jurisdiction since the official residence of the members of the Gas Board and its director is in Pulaski County, Arkansas. On a hearing on October 31, 1958, the trial court took judicial notice of the fact that the official residence of the Gas Board members is in Pulaski County and consequently that the venue of the suit in question is in Pulaski County and not Calhoun County, and granted the Gas Board's motion, quashed the service of summonses as prayed, dismissed the complaint and vacated the temporary injunction; but later, on November 18th, the trial court amended its order of October 31st, to provide that pending the Plaintiff's appeal to this court, the temporary injunction should remain in full force and effect. The Gas Board has appealed from this latter action of the Calhoun Chancery Court to this court, as permitted under Sec. 27-2102, Ark.Stats. 1947.

Appellants (petitioners in the trial court) insist here that, 'The Chancery Court of Calhoun County is devoid of jurisdiction over the petitioners, Liquefied Petroleum Gas Board and M. L. Blair, its Director.' We hold that appellants are correct in this contention. It is undisputed that the members of the Gas Board and their director, Blair, all have their official residence in...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
3 cases
  • Arkansas Game and Fish Com'n v. Mills
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • October 25, 2007
    ...Works v. Colvin, 257 Ark. 889, 521 S.W.2d 206 (1975); Dean v. Cole, 236 Ark. 64, 364 S.W.2d 305 (1963); and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Bd. v. Newton, 230 Ark. 267, 322 S.W.2d 67 (1959). Notably, the majority of those cases are not writ cases. See Daniels v. Weaver, supra; Valley v. Bogard, sup......
  • Ar Game & Fish v. Honorable John N. Harkey
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • June 14, 2001
    ...the official residence of the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission and its director is in Pulaski County. See Liquefied Petroleum Gas Board v. Newton, 230 Ark. 267, 322 S.W.2d 67 (1959). Pursuant to Sections 16-60-103 and 16-106-101, venue for this action lies in Pulaski County. The chancellor......
  • Gill v. State, 4929
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • March 23, 1959