Liranzo v. United States

Docket Number11-61
Decision Date09 August 2012
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex
337 cases
  • Harrington v. Sterling (In re Sterling)
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Southern District of New York
    • October 19, 2016
    ...to tort claims, in the same manner and to the same extent as a private individual under like circumstances.”).Liranzo v. United States , 690 F.3d 78, 85 (2d Cir. 2012). The FTCA provides the exclusive remedy for such claims. See 28 U.S.C. § 2679(b)(1) ; see also Carelock v. United States , ......
  • Watson v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • February 25, 2016
    ...were ‘otherwise privileged’ is determined by consulting federal privileges applicable to federal immigration officers.” Liranzo v. U.S., 690 F.3d 78, 95 (2d Cir.2012) (citing Caban v. United States, 728 F.2d 68, 71 (2d Cir.1984) ). “To be privileged, the actions of the immigration officer m......
  • Mayorov v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois
    • March 23, 2015
    ...was something Congress expressly contemplated when carving out exceptions to the FTCA's liability exemptions. Cf. Liranzo v. United States, 690 F.3d 78, 94–96 (2d Cir.2012) (reasoning that the “plain language of [§ 2680(h) ] suggests” that the Government waives its sovereign immunity for fa......
  • C.D.A. v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    • March 28, 2023
    ... ... FTCA.” Def.'s Mem. at 33. “To say that the ... challenged action is one that only the federal government ... does in fact perform does not necessarily mean that no ... private analog[] exists.” Liranzo v. United ... States , 690 F.3d 78, 94 (2d Cir. 2012). To find ... otherwise would effectively immunize whole swaths of ... governmental functions from FTCA claims. Indeed, nothing in ... the FTCA's text suggests that private persons must be ... able to engage in the ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT