Litsch v. Todds, Irons & Robertson
| Decision Date | 25 November 1924 |
| Citation | Litsch v. Todds, Irons & Robertson, Inc., 239 N.Y. 559, 147 N.E. 194 (N.Y. 1924) |
| Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
| Parties | PETER J. LITSCH, Respondent, v. TODDS, IRONS & ROBERTSON, INC., Appellant. |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department (209 App. Div. 862, 205 N. Y. S. 934), entered June 25, 1924, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action by an employee of a subcontractor against the general contractor to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by said employee through the negligence of said general contractor in failing to keep lighted the stairways of a building under construction by reason of which plaintiff, while in the course of his employment, fell down a stairway and received the injuries complained of.Walter L. Glenney and Bertrand L. Pettigrew, both of New York City, for appellant.
Arthur T. O'Leary, of New York City, for respondent.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
O'NEILL v. Gray
...prevent damage from unusual danger which he knows or ought to know." Indermaur v. Dames, L. R. 2 C. P. 311; Litsch v. Todds, Irons & Robertson, Inc., 239 N. Y. 559, 147 N. E. 194; Pollock on Torts (12 Ed.) page 516. But, irrespective of this, there was section 18 of the New York Labor Law (......
- Woolley v. Colson Amusement Co.