Littler v. the City of Lincoln.
Decision Date | 29 March 1883 |
Citation | 106 Ill. 353,1883 WL 10217 |
Parties | DAVID T. LITTLERv.THE CITY OF LINCOLN. |
Court | Illinois Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
APPEAL from the Appellate Court for the Third District;--heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Logan county; the Hon. CYRUS EPLER, Judge, presiding.
Suit was commenced by the city of Lincoln against David T. Littler, before a justice of the peace of Logan county, for obstructing certain streets. The justice rendered judgment for Littler, and the city appealed to the circuit court of that county. Judgment was there rendered in favor of the city, and against Littler, for $200. Littler appealed from this judgment to the Appellate Court for the Third District, and that court affirmed the judgment of the circuit court. This appeal is from the last named judgment.
Upon the trial the city read in evidence a petition addressed by Littler to the city council of Lincoln, in which Littler represented that he was the owner of all lots and blocks (except two lots belonging to the estate of ______ Bell, in block 152,) north of Eleventh street and west of Adams street, in Knapp, Bird & Tinsley's addition to Postville, then part of the city of Lincoln; that such lots and blocks were vacant and unoccupied; that there were no sufficient streets either on the north or west of said addition; and proposing, in case the prayer of his petition was granted, to convey to the city, for street purposes, enough land on the north and west of said addition--(on the west, north from Eleventh street to the north-west corner of said addition,)--to make good and sufficient streets, and to replat the land in accordance with a plat thereto annexed, and concluding by praying the vacation of all the streets, parts of streets, and all the alleys and parts of alleys, lying north of Eleventh street and west of Adams street, in said addition. The city then also read in evidence the following ordinance, passed by the city of Lincoln in response to said petition:
“ Be it enacted by the City Council of the City of Lincoln:
Section 1. All the streets, parts of streets, and all the alleys and parts of alleys, north of Eleventh street and west of Adams street, in Knapp, Bird & Tinsley's addition to Postville, (now a part of the city of Lincoln,) are hereby vacated; and the right of said city is hereby released to David T. Littler, who is the owner of the land embraced within the limits aforesaid.
Sec. 2. So much of the plat of said addition as lies north of Eleventh street and west of Adams street is hereby vacated.
Sec. 3. All the rights, grants and privileges embraced in the first and second sections of this ordinance, upon this express condition, that the said Littler will convey to the city of Lincoln, for street purposes, the following described strips of land, to-wit: sixty-six feet on the north line of said addition on the land owned by said Littler, and sixteen feet on the west side of Adams street, (and adjacent thereto,) running north from Eleventh street over the land owned by him, which said strips of land are required of the said Littler as the consideration for the grants, rights, privileges, to the said Littler contained in the first and second sections of this ordinance, which said land, when so conveyed, is hereby declared to be subject to the absolute control of the city of Lincoln for street purposes.
Sec. 4. The land lying north of Eleventh street and west of Adams street shall be surveyed and platted substantially in the manner as shown by plat thereof filed in the city clerk's office with the petition of said Littler, and this ordinance shall take effect and be in force only from and after the time the said Littler shall cause such survey and plat to be made, acknowledged and recorded, as provided by law in such cases, which platting, etc., shall be made and completed within six months from the date of approval of this ordinance.
Approved February 3, 1879; passed February 3, 1879.
D. L. BRAUCHER, Mayor.
C. M. KNAPP, City Clerk.”
(Certificate of city clerk, under seal, of the passage and publication of said ordinance.)
Also, a record of a plat filed by Littler, and recorded May 22, 1879, in recorder's office of Logan county. This plat is in conformity with the proposition of Littler, submitted in his petition to the city council. It was properly certified by the county surveyor, and duly acknowledged by Littler.
The city then also read in evidence the record of a quitclaim deed from Sarah Keown and others, to Littler, dated April 2, 1879, conveying their interest in lots 9 and 10, in block 151, in Knapp, Bird & Tinsley's addition to the late town of Postville, (now a part of the city of Lincoln.) Also, a quitclaim deed from Clement Carpenter and wife, to Littler, dated March 22, 1881, conveying lots 3, 4 and 5, in block 152, Knapp, Bird & Tinsley's addition to the city of Lincoln.
The city then called D. H. Harts as a witness, on its behalf, who, being sworn, testified:
The city then also read in evidence the following stipulation between the parties:
“It is stipulated by and between the parties to this suit that the facts are as follows:
The city then read in evidence the following ordinance:
Also, paragraph 20 of the charter of the city of Lincoln, to prevent incumbering of streets, sidewalks, alleys and public grounds of the city, with any article or substance whatever.
This was all the evidence introduced by or on behalf of the city.
Littler then read in evidence the following deed of vacation, which was filed for record April 21, 1879:
“Know all men by these...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Canady v. Coeur d'Alene Lumber Co.
...11 L. R. A. 750; Heller v. Atchison R. R. Co., 28 Kan. 625; Chicago v. Union Bldg. Assn., 102 Ill. 379, 40 Am. Rep. 598; Littler v. City of Lincoln, 106 Ill. 353; Chicago v. Burcky, 158 Ill. 103, 49 Am. St. 142, N.E. 178, 29 L. R. A. 569; Smith v. Boston, 7 Cush. (Mass.) 254; Castle v. Berk......
-
Hubbell v. City of Des Moines
...v. Iowa Central Ry. Co., 126 Iowa, 388, 102 N. W. 139;Enders v. Friday, 78 Neb. 510, 111 N. W. 140, 15 Ann. Cas. 685;Littler v. Lincoln, 106 Ill. 353;Smith v. Boston, 7 Cush. (Mass.) 254;Fearing v. Irwin, 55 N. Y. 486;Buhl v. Depot Co., 98 Mich. 596, 57 N. W. 829, 23 L. R. A. 392;Cram v. La......
-
Hubbell v. City of Des Moines
... ... Iowa Central Railway Co. , ... 126 Iowa 388, 102 N.W. 139; Enders v. Friday , 78 ... Neb. 510 (111 N.W. 140, 15 Ann. Cases 685); Littler v ... City of Lincoln , 106 Ill. 353; Smith v. City of ... Boston , 7 Cush. (Mass.) 254; Fearing v. Irwin , ... 55 N.Y. 486; Buhl v. Fort St ... ...
-
Clokey v. Wabash Ry. Co.
...or be held liable for damages occasioned by reason of their unsafe condition until it has actually accepted such streets. Littler v. City of Lincoln, 106 Ill. 353;Hamilton v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co., 124 Ill. 235, 15 N. E. 854; Nimpfer v. Village of Fox Lake, supra. The pu......