Liu v. Portland State Univ.
Decision Date | 16 May 2016 |
Docket Number | 3:14-CV-00908-BR |
Parties | HENRY D. LIU, Plaintiff, v. PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY, et al., Defendants. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Oregon |
Fargey Law PC
5 Centerpointe Drive, 4th Floor
Lake Oswego, OR 97035
(503) 946-9426
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Miller Nash LLP
111 S.W. Fifth Avenue
Suite 3400
Portland, OR 97204
Attorneys for Defendants Portland State University, Jacqueline Balzer, Domanic Thomas, and Joseph Schilling
J. SCOTT MOEDE
Deputy City Attorneys
1221 S.W. Fourth Avenue, Suite 430
Portland, OR 97204
(503) 823-4047
Attorneys for Defendants City of Portland and James Crooker
Hart Wagner LLP
1000 S.W. Broadway, Twentieth Floor
Portland, Oregon 97205
(503) 222-4499
Attorneys for Defendant Oregon Health & Sciences University
Patterson Buchanan Fobes & Leitch
2112 Third Avenue, Suite 500
Seattle, WA 98121
(206) 462-6700
Attorneys for Defendant Cascadia Behavioral Healthcare
This matter comes before the Court on the Motion (#169) for Summary Judgment of Defendant Oregon Health and Sciences University (OHSU). For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS OHSU's Motion and DISMISSES with prejudice Plaintiff's claims against OHSU.
The following facts are taken from the Agreed Facts in the parties' Pretrial Order and the parties' materials related to OHSU's Motion for Summary Judgment and are undisputed unless otherwise noted.
Plaintiff Henry D. Liu was enrolled as a graduate student in the Conflict Resolution Program at Portland State University (PSU) from the beginning of the fall term in 2011 through June 21, 2012.
On April 20, 2012, another graduate student in the Conflict Resolution Program told PSU Professor Rachel Cunliffe that Plaintiff had made statements about the faculty that the student found threatening. At some point the student also reported her conversation with Plaintiff to PSU Campus Public Safety (CPS) Officer Sergeant Joseph Schilling. The student specifically advised Sergeant Schilling that she was a classmate of Plaintiff and during a break from class on April 12, 2012, Plaintiff told the student that (1) Plaintiff "had issues" with the Conflict Resolution Program and its Director, Professor Robert Gould, because of an unsatisfactory grade that he had received after he caused another student to cry in class; (2) he "had issues" because a fellow student had allegedly used the word "chink" while speaking with him; and (3) he made statements that made the student believe he was angry because he felt faculty members weretreating him differently due to his ethnicity. The student also advised Sergeant Schilling that Plaintiff told her after class on April 12, 2012, that he had a back or spinal injury and was taking a large amount of pain medication that often interfered with his thinking and daily activity. The student suggested alternatives such as yoga and meditation to relieve stress, but Plaintiff stated: "[T]his situation is really pushing me over the edge and we know what happens when students are pushed over the edge." The student emailed Plaintiff shortly after April 12, 2012, and Plaintiff responded he was very stressed, upset, and unable to sleep and was "becoming aware of repressed emotions of anger." The student told Sergeant Schilling that the student talked to Plaintiff after class on April 19, 2012, about Professor Gould, and Plaintiff became agitated, raised his voice, used profanity, and stated: "I'm about ready to stick a .45 in his ass." Plaintiff then lowered his voice and apologized, but he continued to express frustration and stated he was unable to sleep. He also repeated he was taking a lot of pain medication, but it was not helping his pain level. Plaintiff added: "Professor Stan Sitnick giving him a [bad] grade did not help . . ., 'he could get shot.'" Plaintiff told the student that he was noticing he had "a lot of hatred." The student became alarmed, changed the subject, and asked Plaintiff if he had weekend plans. Plaintiff responded he planned to go to "targetpractice on Sunday." Sergeant Schilling believed the student's statements were credible and felt concerned.
Sergeant Schilling ascertained Plaintiff was living off of the PSU campus. Accordingly, Sergeant Schilling contacted the Portland Police Bureau and shared with Portland Police Officer James Crooker the student's statement about Plaintiff.
Officer Crooker contacted the Project Respond team from Defendant Cascadia Behavorial Health Care and asked them to assist in a visit to Plaintiff's residence for a mental-health evaluation and possible Director's Hold pursuant to former Oregon Revised Statute § 426.233.
On April 20, 2012, Officer Crooker, Portland Police Officer Jason Walters, Sergeant Schilling, CPS Officer David Baker, and Cascadia Project Respond personnel Rachel Phariss and Sarah Schellhorn went to Plaintiff's residence to address what they considered to be Plaintiff's possible threat to the community. Phariss and Schellhorn waited around the corner from Plaintiff's apartment while Officers knocked on Plaintiff's door.
Officer Crooker testifies in his Declaration that Plaintiff "appeared dazed and confused and was unable to communicate clearly" when he answered the door. Decl. of James Crooker at ¶ 8. Plaintiff permitted the officers to enter his apartment. Officer Crooker asked Plaintiff if there were any firearms in his apartment, and Plaintiff stated he did not have any firearms.When the officers entered Plaintiff's apartment, however, they observed pamphlets for firearms on a table as well as an empty rifle box. At that point Officer Crooker asked Plaintiff again if there were any firearms in his apartment. Officer Crooker testifies in his Declaration that Plaintiff Crooker Decl. at ¶ 10. Officers also found "various knifes, survival tools (including an axe), a canteen, water bottles, dressings for wounds, rope, extra magazine clips, and flashlights." Id. Officer Crooker testified in his Declaration that in his experience "[t]he manner in which all these items were laid out was consistent with that of a moment's-notice preparedness for immediate accessibility to grab pre-packed grab bags in the event that combat were to occur suddenly." Id. Officers also found prescriptions for Percocet and Tramadol in Plaintiff's name, two bottles of Oxycodone prescribed to Plaintiff's father, and several empty bottles of alcohol.
Officer Crooker spoke with Plaintiff, and, "after a lengthy conversation," Plaintiff admitted he had made "bone-headed" comments "including something about using a .45 caliber handgun to kill a professor." Crooker Decl. at ¶ 11.
To continue reading
Request your trial