Livesley v. Krebs Hop Co.
Decision Date | 01 March 1910 |
Citation | 107 P. 460,57 Or. 352 |
Parties | LIVESLEY et al. v. KREBS HOP CO. |
Court | Oregon Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Marion County; William Galloway, Judge.
Suit by T.A. Livesley and John J. Roberts, copartners as T.A Livesley & Co., against the Krebs Hop Company, a corporation. From a decree in favor of defendant, plaintiffs appeal. Affirmed.
See also, 97 P. 718 and 104 P. 3.
This is a suit for an accounting, and to enjoin the issuance of execution and collection of a judgment, for the sum of $4,000, in a certain action, wherein this defendant was plaintiff and these plaintiffs were defendants. The facts leading up to the controversy are as follows: On August 25 1904, the parties hereto entered into a contract in writing wherein Livesley & Co., the plaintiffs, agreed to purchase and the Krebs Hop Company, defendant, agreed to sell, a certain quantity of hops therein specified. Under this contract (see 51 Or. 527, 528, 92 P. 1084) the Krebs Hop Company agreed to sell and deliver to these plaintiffs, f.o.b. cars Independence, Or., or f.o.b. boat Murphy's Landing, not later than the 15th day of October, during each of the years 1905, 1906, 1907, and 1908, 100,000 pounds of hops, the hops to be the product of, and grown on, the Krebs Hop Company's Buena Vista farm, sometimes known as the Henderson W. Murphy farm, situated in Polk county. The contract price of the hops was 14 cents per pound, to be paid $2,000 between the 1st and 15th day of April of each year, $2,000 between the 1st and 15th day of May of each year, $6,000 between the 1st and 5th day of September of each year, and $4,000 on delivery and acceptance of the hops by the buyer. No controversy respecting compliance with the contract occurred during the year 1905, but on November 4th of that year the Krebs Hop Company executed a warranty deed, purporting to convey to Ladd & Bush the entire farm upon which the hops were to be grown. The deed was recorded 11 days later, at which time an instrument in writing was executed, assigning to Ladd & Bush all payments to accrue to it under the hop contract. Subsequently Ladd & Bush gave notice to Livesley & Co. that all moneys accruing under the contract must be paid to them, and not to their assignor. After some correspondence Livesley & Co. notified Ladd & Bush and the Krebs Hop Company in writing, to the effect that they would retire from and refuse to be bound by the contract. The Krebs Company, without offering to deliver any hops, on May 19, 1906, brought an action against the plaintiffs on the contract, not for damages, but to recover and secure, and did secure, judgment in the sum of $4,000 for the April and May installments. Livesley & Co. then appealed to this court, resulting in an affirmance of the judgment, and on April 30, 1908, a mandate from this court, affirming the judgment in the court below, was entered. At the time of the commencement of this suit defendant was threatening to issue an execution against plaintiff on this judgment; hence this proceeding. The complaint, after alleging facts in substance as above, further alleges, in effect: That during the year 1906 no hops were harvested or baled on the premises described in the contract until after the 1st of September of that year, and that at all times, from the 1st day of September, 1906, until after the 15th day of October, 1906, hops, of the kind and quantity mentioned in the contract, were of the reasonable market value of 14 cents per pound. That defendant company did not deliver or tender to the plaintiffs any of the hops raised upon said premises in the year 1906, but raised more than 100,000 pounds of hops, which it retained and sold, and for which no accounting or offer of accounting has been made to plaintiffs. That on April 30, 1908, plaintiffs made to defendant the following tender in writing:
The further averments in the complaint, so far as material to the controversy, are: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial