Livingston v. Cudd
Decision Date | 21 April 1899 |
Parties | LIVINGSTON v. CUDD. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Appeal from circuit court, Morgan county; H. C. Speake, Judge.
Action by J. H. Livingston against J. J. Cudd. There was a judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals. Reversed.
A demurrer was sustained to the complaint as originally filed and thereupon the plaintiff amended his complaint so as to read as follows: To this complaint the defendant demurred upon the ground that it fails to aver that at the time notice was given to satisfy the mortgage the plaintiff was the owner of any property covered by said mortgage. The court sustained this demurrer, and the plaintiff declining to plead further judgment was rendered for the defendant. The plaintiff appeals, and assigns as error the ruling of the court in sustaining the demurrer to the amended complaint.
O Kyle, for appellant.
E. W. Godbey, for appellee.
Before the amendment of the statute in respect to satisfying mortgages on the record, to its present form, the original section of the Code was, "Any mortgagee who has received satisfaction of the amount secured by such mortgage, must, if the same has been recorded, at the request of the mortgagor enter satisfaction," etc. Code 1886, § 2222. As amended it provides that, "If a mortgage which is of record has been fully paid or satisfied, the mortgagee or the transferee or assignee of the mortgage, who has received payment or satisfaction, must, on the request in writing of the mortgagor, or of a judgment or other creditor of the mortgagor having a lien or claim on the property mortgaged, or of a purchaser from the mortgagor, enter the fact of payment or satisfaction on the margin of the record of the mortgage," etc. Code 1896, § 1066. In default of a compliance within two months thereafter with such request, he forfeits to the...
To continue reading
Request your trial