Livingston v. United States, No. 895

CourtUnited States Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtPER CURIAM; BLACK
Citation364 U.S. 281,4 L.Ed.2d 1719,80 S.Ct. 1611
PartiesOtis W. LIVINGSTON et al. v. UNITED STATES et al
Decision Date27 June 1960
Docket NumberNo. 895

364 U.S. 281
80 S.Ct. 1611
4 L.Ed.2d 1719
Otis W. LIVINGSTON et al.

v.

UNITED STATES et al.

No. 895.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 27, 1960

Messrs. Daniel R. McLeod, Atty. Gen. of South Carolina, James M. Windham and James S. Verner, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellants.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Rice, Messrs. Myron C. Baum, Loren K. Olson and Lionel Kestenbaum, for appellees United States and Atomic Energy Commission.

Messrs. Hugh K. Clark and W. Graham Clayton, Jr., for appellee E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to substitute Harold Murph and Robert C. Wasson in the place of Francis M. Pickney and James W. Crain as parties appellant is granted. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice BLACK and Mr. Justice DOUGLAS are of the opinion probable jurisdiction should be noted.

To continue reading

Request your trial
71 practice notes
  • United States v. State Tax Commission, No. 72-1380
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — First Circuit
    • June 28, 1973
    ...cert. denied 306 U.S. 650, 59 S.Ct. 592, 83 L.Ed. 1049 (1939); United States v. Livingston, 179 F.Supp. 9, 11-12 (E.D.S.C.1959), aff'd, 364 U.S. 281, 80 S.Ct. 1611, 4 L.Ed.2d 1719 (1960). These cases rest in part on the proposition that, absent a strong contrary legislative purpose, the Joh......
  • Rosewell v. Salle National Bank, No. 79-1157
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • March 24, 1981
    ...in order to defeat federal jurisdiction. United States v. Livingston, 179 F.Supp. 9, 15 (EDSC) (three-judge court), aff'd per curiam, 364 U.S. 281, 80 S.Ct. 1611, 4 L.Ed.2d 1719 (1960); United States v. Department of Revenue, 191 F.Supp. 723, 726-727 (ND Ill.), vacated, 368 U.S. 30, 82 S.Ct......
  • United States v. Sullivan, Civ. No. 11928.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court (Connecticut)
    • June 28, 1967
    ...is to be found in the opinion of Judge Haynsworth in United States v. Livingston, 179 F.Supp. 9, 11-12 (E.D. S.C.1959), aff'd per curiam, 364 U.S. 281, 80 S.Ct. 1611, 4 L.Ed.2d 1719 2 A Stipulation of Facts, dated May 24, 1967, is incorporated into this opinion. 3 The "trade and business" p......
  • Ferguson v. US, No. C-87-4175 MHP.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Northern District of California
    • April 24, 1989
    ...Energy Commission contractors. See United States v. Boyd, 378 U.S. 39, 84 S.Ct. 1518, 12 L.Ed.2d 713 (1964); Livingston v. United States, 364 U.S. 281, 80 S.Ct. 1611, 4 L.Ed.2d 1719 (1960) (per curiam), aff'g, 179 F.Supp. 9 (E.D.S.C.1959); Kern-Limerick, Inc. v. Schurlock, 347 U.S. 110, 74 ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
71 cases
  • United States v. State Tax Commission, No. 72-1380
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — First Circuit
    • June 28, 1973
    ...cert. denied 306 U.S. 650, 59 S.Ct. 592, 83 L.Ed. 1049 (1939); United States v. Livingston, 179 F.Supp. 9, 11-12 (E.D.S.C.1959), aff'd, 364 U.S. 281, 80 S.Ct. 1611, 4 L.Ed.2d 1719 (1960). These cases rest in part on the proposition that, absent a strong contrary legislative purpose, the Joh......
  • Rosewell v. Salle National Bank, No. 79-1157
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • March 24, 1981
    ...in order to defeat federal jurisdiction. United States v. Livingston, 179 F.Supp. 9, 15 (EDSC) (three-judge court), aff'd per curiam, 364 U.S. 281, 80 S.Ct. 1611, 4 L.Ed.2d 1719 (1960); United States v. Department of Revenue, 191 F.Supp. 723, 726-727 (ND Ill.), vacated, 368 U.S. 30, 82 S.Ct......
  • United States v. Sullivan, Civ. No. 11928.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court (Connecticut)
    • June 28, 1967
    ...is to be found in the opinion of Judge Haynsworth in United States v. Livingston, 179 F.Supp. 9, 11-12 (E.D. S.C.1959), aff'd per curiam, 364 U.S. 281, 80 S.Ct. 1611, 4 L.Ed.2d 1719 2 A Stipulation of Facts, dated May 24, 1967, is incorporated into this opinion. 3 The "trade and business" p......
  • Ferguson v. US, No. C-87-4175 MHP.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Northern District of California
    • April 24, 1989
    ...Energy Commission contractors. See United States v. Boyd, 378 U.S. 39, 84 S.Ct. 1518, 12 L.Ed.2d 713 (1964); Livingston v. United States, 364 U.S. 281, 80 S.Ct. 1611, 4 L.Ed.2d 1719 (1960) (per curiam), aff'g, 179 F.Supp. 9 (E.D.S.C.1959); Kern-Limerick, Inc. v. Schurlock, 347 U.S. 110, 74 ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT