Lloyd Noland Hosp. v. Durham
Citation | 906 So.2d 157 |
Parties | LLOYD NOLAND HOSPITAL v. Janann DURHAM. |
Decision Date | 07 January 2005 |
Court | Supreme Court of Alabama |
Robert E. Cooper, Deborah Alley Smith, and Jennifer W. Thompson of Christian & Small, LLP, Birmingham, for appellant.
Shay Samples, Ralph D. Cook, and Bruce J. McKee of Hare, Wynn, Newell & Newton, Birmingham, for appellee.
W. Stancil Starnes, Sybil Vogtle Abbot, and Ashley E. Watkins of Starnes & Atchison, LLP, Birmingham, for amicus curiae Medical Association of the State of Alabama.
Lloyd Noland Hospital ("the Hospital") appeals from the denial of its motion for a new trial, following a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of Janann Durham, in Durham's medical-malpractice action against the Hospital and the denial of its motion to alter or amend the judgment as to the payment of future damages. We affirm.
On May 29, 1996, Durham was admitted to the Hospital on the orders of Dr. John Edwards, her gynecologist and primary surgeon, to undergo two surgical procedures during one operation: (1) a "total vaginal hysterectomy and anterior colporrhaphy" ("the first procedure"), and (2) a "RAZ retropubic suspension" ("the second procedure"). Her specific admission orders were handwritten by Dr. George McGrady, Dr. Edwards's partner. Dr. McGrady and Dr. Edwards were partners in the "Henderson & Walton Obstetrical Gynecological Group" ("the Group"), which, pursuant to a contract with the Hospital, provided gynecological care and treatment for patients at the Hospital as "consultants."
The admission orders did not prescribe a preoperative antibiotic. The nursing staff of the Hospital included the admission orders with Durham's chart but did not place with her chart any supplementary, or "standing," orders. Consequently, Durham received no preoperative antibiotic.
Dr. Edwards and Dr. McGrady performed the first procedure; the second procedure was performed by Dr. Leon Hamrick, Jr., a urologist. After the surgery, Durham was dismissed from the Hospital. Subsequently, she developed a postoperative infection that required her to be rehospitalized and to undergo extensive treatment.
On May 27, 1998, Durham sued Dr. Edwards, Dr. Hamrick, and the Hospital. The complaint, as finally amended, alleged, in pertinent part:
(Emphasis added.) By a joint stipulation, Dr. Edwards and Dr. Hamrick were dismissed from the action, and the case proceeded to trial solely against the Hospital.
A jury trial began on July 7, 2003. On July 15, 2003, after the jury was charged, but before it retired to deliberate, the trial judge designated C.W. as the alternate juror, stating: "She will have to go in my office [while the jury deliberates] or somewhere or one of the conference rooms or something." The jury then deliberated for approximately an hour on July 15 and throughout the following day. On July 17, one of the jurors failed to appear for jury duty. The court was informed by the remaining jurors that the absent juror had left the state to attend a family reunion. The following discussions then transpired among the court and counsel:
(Emphasis added.) Alternate juror C.W. was then brought before the court and counsel, was sworn in, and was questioned, first by the court, apparently using some of the written questions the Hospital's counsel had previously proposed to be put to her, and then by the Hospital's counsel. C.W. denied that anyone had talked with her while she was in a conference room awaiting being recalled to the jury, other than another circuit judge who had entered the conference room to inquire if she needed any reading material. According to C.W., she and the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ware v. Timmons
... ... Springhill Mem'l Hosp., 575 So.2d 547, 550 (Ala. 1990). We have previously stated that "[p]roof ... Lloyd Noland Hosp. v. Durham, 906 So.2d 157, 173 (Ala.2005) (this Court will ... ...
-
Ware v. Timmons, No. 1030488 (Ala. 9/22/2006)
... ... servant." Hendley v. Springhill Mem'l Hosp. , 575 So. 2d 547, 550 (Ala. 1990). We have previously stated that ... Lloyd Noland Hosp. v. Durham , 906 So. 2d 157, 173 (Ala. 2005) (this Court will ... ...
-
Pavilion Development v. Jbj Partnership
... ... Prowell v. Children's Hosp. of Alabama, 949 So.2d 117 (Ala.2006) ... B. Authority to Assign ... only in the reply brief.'" Fogarty, 953 So.2d at 1232 (quoting Lloyd Noland Hosp. v. Durham, 906 So.2d 157, 173 (Ala.2005)). Insofar as I can ... ...
-
Suttles v. Roy
... ... See Lloyd Noland Hosp. v. Durham, 906 So.2d 157, 174 (Ala.2005) (stating that, to ... ...
-
Point: Justice Must Satisfy the Appearance of Justice-a 10-year Review of the Alabama Supreme Court's Treatment of Jury Verdicts in the Plaintiffs' Favor
...punitive)—fraud—Hunt Petroleum v. State, 901 So. 2d 1 (Ala. 2004) 2005 $765,920—medical malpractice—Lloyd Noland Hospital v. Durham, 906 So. 2d 157 (Ala. 2005) $5.5 million—fraud and breach of contract—Alfa Life Ins. Co. v. Jackson, 906 So. 2d 143 (Ala. 2005) 2006 $350,000—fraud—Cochran v. ......