Your World of Legal Intelligence
 United States | 1-929-605-4013

Lobato v. Taylor

Document Cited authorities 20 Cited in 32 Precedent Map Related
Decision Date11 May 2000
Citation13 P.3d 821
Docket Number98CA1442
PartiesEugene LOBATO; Zack Bernal; Gabrielita Adeline Espinosa; Edward Espinosa; Pete E. Espinosa, Jr.; Corpus Gallegos by and through his conservator Yvette Gallegos; Gloria Gallegos; Rupert Gallegos; Raymond Garcia; Charlie Jacquez, Jr.; Adolph J. Lobato; Bonifacio "Bonnie" Lobato by and through his conservator Teresa Lobato; Carlos Lobato; Emilio Lobato, Jr.; Jose F. Lobato; Presesentacion J. Lobato; Gloria Maestas; Norman Maestas; Robert "Bobby" Maestas; Raymond J. Maestas; Eugene Martinez; Mark Martinez; Agatha Medina; Gilbert "Andres" Montoya; Shirley Romero Otero; Eppie Quintana; Lucille Samelko; Arnold Valdez; Ervin L. Vigil; Larry J. Vigil; Michael J. Vigil; Billy Alire; Robert Atencio; Frances D. Berggran-Buhrles; Jose Fred Carson; Elmer Manuel Espinosa; Margurito Espinosa; Moises Gallegos; Ruben Gallegos; Richard J. Garcia; Manuel Gardunio; Ruben Herrara; Jeffrey Jacquez; Adelmo Kaber; Crucito Maes; Daniel Martinez; David Martinez; Jesse Martinez; Leonardo Martinez; Rosendo Martinez; Solestiano Martinez; Alfonso Medina; Gilbert Medina; Leandardo Medina; Loyola Medina; Marvin Medina; Orry Medina; Raymond N. Medina; Rudy Montoya; Gurtrude C. Olivas; Eppy Wayne Quintana; Robert Romero; Shirley Romero; Anthony Sanchez; Bonnie Sanchez; Eugene Sanchez; Evan Sanchez; James Sanchez; Jose G. Sanchez; Rufino Sanchez; S.R. Sanchez; Vernon Sanchez; Ronald A. Sandoval; Elesam Santistevan; Daniel Segura; Floyd R. Solan; Carolyn Taylor; Sam Valdez; Martha Vialpondo; Joe P. Vigil; and Walter Vigil, Plaintiffs-Appellants and Cross-Appellees, v. Zachary TAYLOR, as executor of the Estate of Jack T. Taylor, Jr., Deceased, and The Taylor Family Partnership, Defendants-Appellees and Cross-Appellants, and J. Hoy Anderson; Marvin Lavern Stohs; Edythe Kelly Stohs; Charles W. Gelderman; William F. Phinney; Harlan A. Brown; Dena F. Fuhrmann; Jimmy C. Crook; Freeland D. Crumley; Joseph P. Campisi; Hugh R. Denton; Robert Paul Resteli; Eugene J. Kafka; Avis M. Anderson; Clifford R. Jenson; Don W. Jacobs; Raymond E. Gauthier; Francis P. Heston; and Howard G. Frailey; Defendants-Appellees.
CourtColorado Court of Appeals
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
31 cases
  • Lobato v. Taylor
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • June 24, 2002
    ...appealed both the due process determination and the rulings on their claim of rights. The court of appeals affirmed. Lobato v. Taylor, 13 P.3d 821 (Colo.App.2000). The court agreed with the trial court's conclusions regarding all three of the landowners' theories. Regarding an express grant......
  • French v Evans
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • February 5, 2015
    ...2005). But a claim is not substantially frivolous simply because its proponent advances a losing argument. Id. (citing Lobato v. Taylor, 13 P.3d 821, 836 (Colo. App. 2000), rev’d on other grounds, 70 P.3d 1152 (Colo. 2003)). B. Analysis On remand, the trial court determined that the co-buye......
  • People v. Manyik
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • March 24, 2016
  • 08CA2141
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • January 1, 2009
    ...if the proponent can present no rational argument based on the evidence or law in support of that claim or defense. Lobato v. Taylor, 13 P.3d 821 (Colo. App. 2000), rev’d on other grounds, 71 P.3d 938 (Colo. 2002). A determination that a party is not entitled to relief does not make the par......
    • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT