Lochner v. Moreland

Decision Date11 December 1951
Docket NumberNo. 6339.,6339.
Citation192 F.2d 985
PartiesLOCHNER v. MORELAND.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit

Irving B. Grandberg, Baltimore, Md., for appellant.

Everett L. Buckmaster and Charles Mindel, Baltimore, Md. (George L. Clarke and Buckmaster, White, Mindel & Clarke, all of Baltimore, Md., and Mudd & Mudd, La Plata, Md., on brief), for appellee.

Before PARKER, Chief Judge, DOBIE, Circuit Judge, and MOORE, District Judge.

PARKER, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal in a controversy arising in a bankruptcy proceeding over an automobile truck which the bankrupt had contracted to purchase from an automobile dealer. The District Judge held in favor of the dealer who was claiming the truck and the trustee in bankruptcy has appealed. The facts are that sometime before bankruptcy the bankrupt contracted to purchase from claimant a motor truck upon which claimant was to have built a refrigerated body of special design. The price agreed upon was $5581.90 and an old truck was accepted by claimant in payment of $500 of the purchase price. Under the contract between the parties, bankrupt was not to have possession of the truck until one-fourth of the purchase price should have been paid and until that time it was to remain in possession of claimant. The amount stipulated was never paid and the truck remained in claimant's possession at all times. Title under the state automobile registration was registered in claimant and never transferred to bankrupt.

Prior to bankruptcy claimant obtained from bankrupt a note in the sum of $8337 covering the balance due on the truck and the balance due on merchandise which it had sold claimant; but claimant's possession of the truck was in no way interfered with as a result of this transaction. The note authorized confession of judgment; and plaintiff obtained judgment against defendant thereon and caused execution to be issued. Levy under the execution was made on certain personal property including the truck, but there was no sale under the execution. Following the levy, bankrupt filed a petition for an arrangement under Chapter XI of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 701 et seq., and this resulted in the bankruptcy proceedings in the court below. Claimant filed a petition in these proceedings claiming the truck and the District Judge held in his favor, directing that the proceeds of the sale of the truck be credited on the balance due on the purchase price if not in excess of that amount and that claimant be allowed to prove an unsecured claim for any deficiency.

We think that this holding of the District Judge was clearly right. By express agreement of the parties claimant had a lien on the truck for the unpaid purchase price with right to retain possession for the enforcement of the lien. In addition to this he had a lien as an unpaid seller for the remainder of the purchase price so long as the truck remained in his possession. Flack's Annotated Code of Maryland, art. 83, sec. 71(1)(a). Because of this possession, the lien was good against creditors notwithstanding it was not registered in accordance with the requirements of the Maryland Code, art. 21, sec. 71; for it is well settled that possession of personal property by one holding a lien thereon dispenses with the necessity of recording. In re Sachs, D.C., 21 F.2d 984, Id., 4 Cir., 30 F. 2d 510; Bryan v. Hawthorne, 1...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Wethered v. Alban Tractor Co.
    • United States
    • Maryland Court of Appeals
    • 9 Marzo 1961
    ...York, 2 Cir., 119 F.2d 559. Cf. United States v. Gilbert Associates, Inc., 345 U.S. 361, 73 S.Ct. 701, 97 L.Ed. 1071, and Lochner v. Moreland, 4 Cir., 192 F.2d 985, 987. Nor do we reach the question whether when Section 6323 says the Federal lien shall not be valid as against 'any mortgagee......
  • In re Rogal
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of California
    • 18 Mayo 1953
    ...the law of Oklahoma, Mulhern v. Albin, 8 Cir., 1947, 163 F.2d 41, under the law of Iowa, and as to personal property, in Lochner v. Moreland, 5 Cir., 1951, 192 F.2d 985, under the law of 3 This was a reassertion of the same principle declared in a prior appeal in the same case, Breeze v. Br......
  • Watson v. Heil
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • 11 Diciembre 1951

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT