Lockwood v. City of St. Louis
Decision Date | 31 October 1856 |
Citation | 24 Mo. 20 |
Parties | LOCKWOOD et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS et al., Respondents. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
1. Although the courts will not interfere by injunction to restrain the sale of personal property levied upon and advertised to be sold for the payment of taxes illegally assessed; yet, it seems, they will so interfere where it is sought to enjoin the sale of real property. (Deane v. Todd, 22 Mo. 91, explained.)
2. Church property in the city of St. Louis was liable, under the sewerage act of March 12th, 1849 (Sess. Acts, 1849, p. 519), to be assessed for the construction of sewers.
This was a petition for an injunction to restrain the sale, by the city of St. Louis, of St. George's church. The plaintiffs are the trustees of St. George's church. They allege in their petition that a special tax for the year 1854, amounting to $139.25, was assessed upon St. George's church for the construction of a sewer in the district in which said church is situated; that the said church had been advertised for sale for the payment of said tax by the city of St. Louis, by her comptroller, H. Overstoltz. Plaintiffs prayed for an order enjoining the sale; also that the city be enjoined against further assessing or levying any tax against said church property for the construction of said sewer.
A restraining order was granted. The petition was demurred to, and, the demurrer having been sustained, the injunction was dissolved. Plaintiffs appealed to this court.
J. A. Kasson, for appellants.
T. T. Gantt and W. L. Williams, for respondents.
1. This court has allowed relief by injunction in several cases where real property was about to be sold for the nonpayment of taxes assessed by a municipal corporation, but has never allowed it, that I am aware of, to prevent a sale of personal property. The distinction is obvious enough. In one case a cloud is about to be drawn over a land title, and the court interferes to prevent it; in the other, the legal remedy is full and ample, and no reason exists for the interposition of equity. The present case falls within the previous decisions of this court; but in Deane v. Todd (22 Mo. 91), to which we have been referred, the sale sought to be enjoined was of personal property; and, although the judgment there certainly did not extend the doctrine of this court, as to the relief by injunction to sales of personal property, it did not disturb the adjudications already made in reference to sales of real property, no matter what the judges, who concurred in that opinion, may have thought of those decisions as an original question.
2. The principal matter, however, for our judgment here, is whether church property is liable to be assessed for the construction of a sewer, pursuant to the St. Louis sewerage act of the 12th of March, 1849. These special assessments are found in the English law, and have prevailed, it is believed, in most, if not all, of our American states, and their validity, when assessed as in this instance, cannot be questioned under our Constitution. Their...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Wood
...with reference to real estate only. 6 Am. & Eng. Enc. Law, p. 150, and cases cited. This is the settled law of this state. Lockwood v. City of St. Louis, 24 Mo. 20; Leslie v. Same, 47 Mo. 474; Town of Warrensburg v. Miller, 77 Mo. 56; Sayre v. Tompkins, 23 Mo. 443; Bank v. Kansas City, 73 M......
-
Verdin v. City of St. Louis
...which, when issued, became a lien and cloud upon plaintiffs' title, and not to mere irregularities in the proceedings. In Lockwood v. City of St. Louis, 24 Mo. 20, in passing upon a similar question to the one now under consideration, Leonard, J., in speaking for the court, said: "This cour......
-
Rolph v. City of Fargo
... ... 186; ... Daily v. Swope , 47 Miss. 367; ... Williams v. Cammack , 27 Miss. 209; ... Garrett v. City of St. Louis , 25 Mo. 505; ... Cain v. Commissioners , 86 N.C. 8; ... Hill v. Higdon , 5 Ohio St. 243; ... King v. City of Portland , 2 Ore. 146; ... Dist. , 92 Cal ... 296, 324, 28 P. 272, 675; Burnett v. Mayor, ... etc. , 12 Cal. 76; Creighton v. Scott , ... 14 Ohio St. 438; Lockwood v. City of St ... Louis , 24 Mo. 20; Keese v. City of ... Denver , 10 Colo. 112, 15 P. 825; Gilmore v ... Hentig , 33 Kan. 156, 173, ... ...
-
Second Nat Bank of Titusville, Pennsylvania v. Caldwell
... ... At the ... hearing of this case the validity of the ordinance of the ... city of Titusville, in so far as it attempts to impose a tax ... license upon national banks doing ... Polk Co. 18 Iowa 70; Holland v. Baltimore, ... 11 Md. 186; Leslie v. St. Louis, 47 Mo. 474; Burnett v ... Cincinnati, 3 Ohio, 73; Culbertson v. Cincinnati, 16 Ohio, ... 574; ... 498; Weller v. St. Paul, 5 Minn. 95; ... Morrison v. St. Paul, 9 Minn. 108; Lockwood v. St. Louis, 24 ... Mo. 20; Fowler v. St. Joseph, 37 Mo. 228; South Platte Land ... Co. v ... ...
-
Section 5.31 Special Improvements and Special Assessment Financing
...and by §§ 88.747 and 88.750, RSMo 2016, counties are subject to such liability. Under the early decision in Lockwood v. City of St. Louis, 24 Mo. 20, 23 (1856), charitable institutions are liable for special assessments. Decisions from other jurisdictions are collected at Eugene McQuillin, ......