Logan v. Lehman, No. 95-1216

CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Writing for the CourtBefore PLAGER, LOURIE, and CLEVENGER; PER CURIAM
Citation73 F.3d 379
PartiesNOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Charles C. LOGAN, II, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bruce A. LEHMAN, Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, Defendant-Appellee.
Decision Date06 December 1995
Docket NumberNo. 95-1216

Page 379

73 F.3d 379
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
Charles C. LOGAN, II, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Bruce A. LEHMAN, Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks,
Defendant-Appellee.
No. 95-1216.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Dec. 6, 1995.

Before PLAGER, LOURIE, and CLEVENGER, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Fed.Cir.R. 36.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 practice notes
  • Practice and procedure: Patent and trademark cases rules of practice; representation of others before Patent and Trademark Office,
    • United States
    • Federal Register December 12, 2003
    • December 12, 2003
    ...v. Logan, 27 USPQ2d 1870 (Comm'r Pat. 1993), aff'd. sub nom., Logan v. Comer, No. 93-0335 (D.D.C. 1994), aff'd. sub nom., Logan v. Lehman, 73 F.3d 379 (Fed. Cir. 1995). No Office rules governing practice before the Office justify withholding information from a client to serve a practitioner......
  • Part II
    • United States
    • Federal Register December 12, 2003
    • December 12, 2003
    ...v. Logan, 27 USPQ2d 1870 (Comm'r Pat. 1993), aff'd. sub nom., Logan v. Comer, No. 93-0335 (D.D.C. 1994), aff'd. sub nom., Logan v. Lehman, 73 F.3d 379 (Fed. Cir. 1995). No Office rules governing practice before the Office justify withholding information from a client to serve a practitioner......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT